 |
DEVELOPING
COUNTRIES RAISE BIODIVERSITY CONCERNS IN WIPO
The WIPO [World
Intellectual Property Organization] Standing Committee on the Law
of Patents met on 25-29 November in Geneva to continue negotiations
on a possible treaty covering substantive patent law at the international
level. Among the issues discussed were proposals by several developing
countries calling for flexibility to implement measures in pursuit
of public policy objectives, including those related to health,
environment and biodiversity.
The negotiations
on the Substantive Patent Law Treaty (SPLT), underway since November
2000, constitute one of the fundamental pillars of WIPO's patent
agenda together with the reform process of the Patent Cooperation
Treaty and the Secretariat's efforts in marketing the Patent Law
Treaty (see BRIDGES
Trade BioRes, 10 October 2002). The SPLT would cover a number
of basic legal principles that underpin the granting of patents
in different countries.
Developing
country proposals address environment and biodiversity
In the context
of general exceptions and the ground for refusal or invalidation
of patents, two developing country proposals were submitted related
the protection of public health, the environment and other areas
of importance to them, including the protection of genetic resources
and traditional knowledge (TK). Specifically, the Dominican Republic
on behalf of Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Honduras, Nicaragua,
Peru and Venezuela -- supported by Brazil and Egypt -- proposed
the inclusion of language stressing that nothing in the SPLT should
limit countries' freedom "to comply with international obligations,
including those relating to the protection of genetic resources,
biological diversities, traditional knowledge and the environment"
(Article 2.2). The countries thereby aimed to ensure flexibility
to control access to TK and genetic resources under their jurisdiction
in an effort to prevent unlawful appropriation and biopiracy.
The second proposal
submitted by Brazil proposed the inclusion of public interest exceptions,
stating that nothing in the Treaty should prevent countries from
protecting "public health, nutrition and the environment"
(Article 2.3). In addition, Brazil would like to see "compliance
with applicable law on other matters" to be included as grounds
for refusal of a claimed invention, including "law on public
health, nutrition, ethics in scientific research, environment, access
to genetic resources, protection of traditional knowledge and other
areas of public interests" (Article 13.3). The two proposals
were included in the draft Treaty in square brackets (i.e. not agreed)
together with a footnote specifying that the Committee had agreed
to include the paragraph in square brackets "but to postpone
substantive discussion on these provisions".
Civil society
groups starting to arrive
While it seems
that the technical character of the Standing Committee's discussions
has reduced the interest of many NGOs in demanding observer status,
this barrier is starting to be overcome. Civil society groups are
increasingly paying attention to the possible consequences that
negotiations in WIPO could have on public policy areas, such as
health, human rights, environment and development. Among the interested
civil society groups is the international NGO Genetic Recourses
Action International (GRAIN), which was accredited as an ad hoc
observer to the Standing Committee at the November meeting. GRAIN
has criticise the WIPO agenda in the past, noting that "setting
up of a world patent system has huge implications. It means the
end of patent policy as a tool for national development strategies".
Regarding the SPLT, GRAIN has expressed concern that the Treaty
could make the TRIPs Agreement obsolete as it would set up a fixed
set of rules on what could be patented and under what conditions.
Additional
Resources
Standing Committee
on Patents' documents and country proposals can be found at
www.wipo.org/news/en/index.html?wipo_content_frame=/news/en/conferences.html
"WIPO
Moves Toward 'World' Patent System," GRAIN, July 2002.
ICTSD reporting.
|
 |