| TRADITIONAL
KNOWLEDGE ON THE AGENDA AT UNFF-4
The fourth
session of the United Nations Forum on Forests (UNFF-4) was
held in Geneva, Switzerland, from 3-14 May. Faced with an ambitious
agenda of seven decisions to negotiate, UNFF-4 succeeded in adopting
only five of them, failing, inter alia, to agree on a resolution
dealing with traditional forest-related knowledge (TFRK). Discussions
at UNFF-5 will focus on the future of the Forum, including the various
legal options for achieving its aim of promoting the management,
conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests.
Traditional
knowledge: Agreeing to disagree
After long and
protracted negotiations that continued late into the night on the
penultimate day of the conference, delegates finally gave up on
adopting a draft resolution on TFRK. Despite a generally constructive
spirit, discussions were plagued by similar divisions as has been
witnessed in other forums dealing with traditional knowledge-related
issues (see also related story, this issue). Specifically, developing
countries (G-77/China) expressed concern over proposed language
on the facilitation of access to TFRK, the perceived emphasis of
using of mainstream intellectual property tools to protect the knowledge,
and that discussions at UNFF might prejudge similar debates in other
forums, such as the CBD, WIPO and WTO. Some observers noted that
the Forum might have been too ambitious in its effort to address
such a "deeply political issue" as traditional knowledge,
given the divisions witnessed in similar discussions in other forums.
Looking ahead
towards UNFF-5 and beyond
Although there
was no official discussion on the future of the UNFF after its fifth
session, it was certainly on everyone's minds. Most delegates appeared
to agree that the UNFF in its current form had not delivered on
its aims and was not politically viable for the future. Some of
the options being considered in the post UNFF-5 era range from the
current (but strengthened) arrangement to a legally-binding treaty.
Other options being referred to include a protocol under the CBD
and a soft legal instrument in the form of a set of binding guidelines
or principles. The future of the forest forum will be discussed
at length when the Ad-Hoc Expert Group on Consideration with a View
to Recommending Parameters of a Mandate for Developing a Legal Framework
for all Types of Forests will meet in September this year. A decision
will have to be taken at UNFF-5, where Parties will also be reviewing
the effectiveness of the international arrangements on forests.
UNFF-5 will
be held on 16-27 May in New York.
Additional
Resources
For daily reporting
and a detailed analysis of UNFF-5, see IISD
Linkages.
ENB Vo. 13 No. 116, 17 May 2004.
|