 |
In Brief
EUROPE
LOOKS BEYOND KYOTO AS PROTOCOL ENTERS INTO FORCE
The 1997 Kyoto
Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC) entered into force on 16 February (see BRIDGES
Trade BioRes, 19 November 2004). The event was celebrated around
the world both by governments and civil society groups, despite
the fact that some significant polluters -- such as the US -- have
chosen to remain outside the treaty. Environmental groups also stressed
that although the Kyoto Protocol was important, and its entry into
force signalled a commitment among Parties to move towards a low-carbon
economy, it only represented a first step. Friends of the Earth's
Catherine Pearce commented that "It is time for rich countries
to act now, before it becomes too late... With concerted action,
industrialised countries, led by the European Union, can be delivering
cuts in emissions and set us on the path to 80 percent reductions
by 2050".
A week earlier,
on 9 February, the European Commission released a communication
on its strategy beyond 2012, when the first commitment period of
the Kyoto Protocol ends. According to European Environment Commissioner
Stavros Dimas, "We will continue to lead by example, but we
will also continue to pressure hard for all of our international
partners to come on board." Among measures for future EU climate
policy, the Commission proposed: including new sectors, such as
aviation, maritime transport and forestry; supporting innovation
and research on new climate-friendly technologies; continuing the
use of flexible market-based instruments such as emissions trading
both in the EU and internationally; and focusing on adaptation policy.
Canadian Prime
Minister Paul Martin announced on 16 February that the 11th Conference
of the Parties -- which will also be the first Meeting of the Parties
when negotiations will begin on the post-2012 phase -- will be held
in Montreal, Canada in early December 2004.
To access the
Commission documents visit here.
"Canada
To Host Next Major International Meeting Setting Global Course On
Climate Change Beyond Kyoto," CANADIAN GOVERNMENT, 16 February
2005; "Climate Change Treaty Goes Live But Battle On Emissions
Has Only Just Begun," FOEI RELEASE, 14 February 2005; "EU
Climate Policy Aims for Wider International Involvement," ENS,
10 February 2005; "EU Climate Policy Aims for Wider International
Involvement," EC RELEASE, 9 February 2005.
US
QUESTIONS EU ON WOOD PALLET RESTRICTIONS
US Trade Representative
Robert Zoellick urged European governments in a 9 February letter
to suspend a new rule, scheduled to go into effect on 1 March, that
would require wood pallets used to import many goods into the EU
to be bark-free. The EU had approved the new regulation last October
in an effort to "prevent nasty little insects from getting
into the ports and causing all kinds of damage," according
to Anthony Gooch, a spokesman for the European Commission in Washington.
EU officials will discuss the potentially trade-distorting effects
of this environmental regulation, and the possibility of delaying
it, at a meeting on 28 February. The US as well as a number of Latin
American countries have previously raised related concerns at the
WTO Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, arguing that
the requirements go beyond the agreed International Standard for
Phytosanitary Measures on wood packaging (see Bridges
Weekly, 3 November 2004).
Wood pallets,
which are used to ship more than US$8 billion in goods from the
US to the EU annually, can provide temporary sanctuary to insects
that are harmful to plants. Several countries, including Brazil
and Finland, have imposed regulations in response to outbreaks of
long-horned beetles, requiring wood pallets to be heat-treated,
fumigated or treated with preservatives prior to departure from
the country of origin. Among the chemicals used to treat pallets,
methyl bromide -- a significant ozone depleting substance -- has
proven controversial among Parties to the Montreal Protocol on ozone-depleting
substances who have repeatedly failed to agree on whether to allow
limited use (see Bridges
Trade BioRes, 3 December 2004).
"U.S. Complains
to Europe Over Rules on Wood Pallets," BLOOMBERG, 10 February
2005; "Insects making pallets unpalatable," BOSTON GLOBE,
13 February 2005.
DNA
'BARCODING' PROJECT LAUNCHED
The Consortium
for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) held their first international conference
from 7 to 9 February where they launched an initiative to create
a database that will enable identification of all plant and animal
species based on a portion of their DNA. This process, dubbed 'DNA
Barcoding', uses a DNA sequence from an agreed-upon location in
the genome to characterise species of organisms. The database will
not only facilitate the finding of new species, but also help to
identify carriers of disease and monitor endangered species. However,
some researchers expressed doubts about the reliability of the approach,
particularly in classifying closely related species. The process
is split into three classification projects based on the type of
organism: species of birds; marine and fresh water fish; and plants
in Costa Rica and Central America. The CBOL hope to collect barcodes
for the 10,000 known species of birds by 2010.
"Consortium
for the Barcode of Life," SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE, 17 February
2005; "Genetic Barcodes Will Identify World's Species,"
REUTERS, 17 February 2005; "Science Intends to Tag All Life,"
BBC NEWS, 17 February 2005.
WTO
MEMBERS MEET FOR FIRST COTTON TALKS
The WTO Cotton
Sub-committee, set up in the July framework adopted by WTO Members
last year (Bridges Trade BioRes,
6 August 2004), met for the first time on 11 February. The Sub-committee
agreed to focus on assessing progress in the agriculture negotiations
and including regular updates on developmental aspects of the cotton
initiative to ensure coherence between trade and development aspects
of the issue. Members, however, failed to agree on whether the scope
of the group should include any other issues. The US advocated for
including a heading of "other" in the work programme,
which would allow Members to raise broader issues raised in non-agricultural
market access negotiations (such as textiles), trade remedies and
other government policies. The move was opposed by India, Egypt,
Brazil, Argentina, Pakistan, Paraguay, China and Japan. Most speakers
stressed the importance of the cotton issue, in particular given
the impact of cotton subsidies on poor farmers, and reiterated the
mandate to proceed "ambitiously, expeditiously, and specifically"
given to the group from the July Package. Chairperson Tim Groser
(New Zealand) stressed that 100 million farmers in 80 developing
countries produce cotton and noted that the issue was important
enough to decide the fate of the Doha negotiations. The meeting
was suspended for consultations and will meet again once agreement
is reached on the work programme.
ICTSD Reporting.
|
 |