 |
In Brief
EUROPEAN
PATENT OFFICE UPHOLDS NEEM PATENT REVOCATION
The Technical
Board of Appeals of the European Patent Office (EPO) on 8 March
upheld a 2000 decision to revoke a patent on a fungicidal product
extracted from seeds from the Indian neem tree, bringing to a close
a ten-year battle around the patent (see BRIDGES
Weekly, 23 May 2000). The decision thereby dismissed an appeal
brought by the original defendants -- biotech company Thermo Trilogy
and the US. A reformulated claim submitted by the patent holders
as part of their appeal was rejected on formal grounds. Subsequently,
the main body of the patent was tested with regard to novelty, disclosure,
and inventive step -- and irrevocably revoked.
The case had
originally been brought to the EPO in 1995 by Indian environmentalist
Vandana Shiva, Magda Aelvoet (then MEP and President of the Greens
in the European Parliament), and the International Federation of
Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). According to Magda Aelvoet,
now the Belgian Minister of State, "Our victory against biopiracy
is threefold. First, it is a victory for traditional knowledge and
practices...Second, it is a victory for solidarity: with the people
of developing countries -- who have definitively earned the sovereign
rights to their natural resources -- and with our colleagues in
the NGOs, who fought with us against this patent for the last ten
years. And third, coming as it does on International Women's Day,
this is also a victory for women."
Landmark Victory
in World's First Case Against Biopiracy: European Patent Office
Upholds Decision to Revoke Neem Patent," RFSEE, GREENS/EFA AND IFOAM,
8 March 2005.
CHINA'S
TIMBER NEEDS THREATEN WORLD FORESTS - REPORT
In their 8 March
report "China's Wood Market, Trade and the Environment", the environmental
group WWF urged China to change its current policies regarding timber
imports and logging to avert "devastating impacts on some of the
planet's outstanding forests" resulting from the country's rapidly
rising demand for wood. Since China's logging ban in 1998 due to
the flooding of the Yangtze, domestic wood production has dropped
significantly and China has been able to start preserving threatened
forests through forest restoration and sustainable forest management.
To meet growing demand, imports have increased substantially --
making China the second-largest market for industrial timber, pulp
and paper in the world -- including from countries where illegal
logging is rampant, such as Russia, Malaysia and Indonesia. "Logging
bans in China should not lead to forest loss in other parts of the
world," said Claude Martin, Director General of WWF International.
"Decisive action is needed to ensure that supply chains leading
to or through China begin with well-managed forests," he added.
Along with the environmental damage, there are also significant
financial losses from illegal logging. Indonesia, for instance,
one of China's leading providers of timber, is losing billions of
dollars in tax revenue due to the illegal logging.
The report is
available here.
"China Timber
Demand Threatens World's Forests - WWF," REUTERS, 9 March 2005.
EUROPE
TO ADJUST BORDER PRICES IN TRADE WITH NON-KYOTO COUNTRIES?
Caroline Lucas,
a Member of the European Parliament (MEP), recently raised the issue
of adjustment measures at the border to protect European companies
-- which face costs related to climate change abatement under the
Kyoto Protocol -- from unfair competition from companies in non-Kyoto
countries such as the US, which "are avoiding these costs at the
expense of the global environment". Lucas suggested that the European
Commission raise the issue at the WTO, since the advantage enjoyed
by companies in countries outside the Kyoto regime could be considered
a subsidy which "could be subject to redress in the form of countervailing
duties or border tax adjustments" under WTO rules. The European
Commission recently outlined its strategy beyond 2012, when the
first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol ends (see BRIDGES
Trade BioRes, 18 February 2005). The strategy includes enticing
countries currently outside the Kyoto Protocol to come on board.
Responding to
Lucas on 9 March, the European Commission said, however, that it
had no plans of raising the issue at the WTO, as it "does not
expect any major negative competitiveness impacts from EU climate
policies". The Commission also noted that in its future climate
strategy, it would seek to incentives through constructive dialogue,
to encourage non-Parties to participate in the next steps of the
climate regime.
Question
posed by MEP Caroline Lucas to the European Commission.
European Commission
response.
"Mandelson Rejects
MEPs Call For US Kyoto Tax," NEWS RELEASE FROM C. LUCAS, 9 March
2005.
BLAIR
COMMISSION FOR AFRICA CALLS FOR FAIRER
The Commission
for Africa established in 2004 by British Prime Minister Tony Blair
issued its report on 11 March, calling for "more and fairer trade"
for the continent. It put forward recommendations for reducing poverty
in Africa, and helping the continent cope with globalisation. The
450-page study identifies governance, capacity building, peace and
security, education, healthcare, trade, and an additional US$25
billion per year in aid by 2010 as essential to combating poverty
and promoting growth in the world's poorest. The report concludes
that increasing Africa's capacity to trade would require investments
in infrastructure and the creation of an enabling climate for the
private sector. It also emphasises that that development concerns
must be the priority in all trade agreements, urging developed countries
to address non-tariff trade barriers facing developing country exporters,
and to use the Doha Round to set end dates for "appalling levels
of developed country protectionism and subsidies". The Commission
encouraged them to provide transitional support to African countries
to help them deal with negative social and economic effects resulting
from the removal of global trade barriers and the erosion of trade
preferences.
African leaders
generally welcomed the report, although South African President
Thabo Mbeki noted that it must be translated into concrete action.
Critics, however, pointed out that the Commission's recommendations
were not new, and that developed countries had often failed to deliver
on past promises of aid and debt-relief to Africa. Others said that
the study offered some novel suggestions, including the call for
the developed world to play a more active role in policing corrupt
payments and repatriating funds deposited by African dictators in
European banks.
The full report
is available here.
ICTSD reporting;
"Can we dare implement Blair Commission report?" IPP Media, 14 March
2005; "Commission for Africa," All Africa.com, 14 March 2005; "Development-Africa:
A Mixed Verdict for Commission's Report," allAfrica.com, 14 March
2005; "Africa must be strengthened to compete globally," ghanaweb.com,
14 March 2005; "Mbeki welcomes Blair's Commission for Africa report",
SABC News, 11 March 2005..
|
 |