CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS CRITICISE WORLD BANK CLEAN ENERGY STRATEGY
Future energy options featured on the agenda of global finance ministers
attending the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) annual
meetings in Singapore from 13-20 September. The joint IMF-World Bank
Development Committee considered progress with regard to the elaboration
of an investment framework for clean energy and development, welcomed
progress to date and called for additional donor funding. However,
a number of environment and development NGOs joined forces to criticise
the clean energy plan for "selling the climate and poor people
short". They recommended a much stronger focus on renewable energy,
including the creation of a new Renewable Energy for Development Agency.
Progress
report on clean energy investment
One of the major
background reports for this year's meetings was "An
Investment Framework For Clean Energy And Development: A Progress
Report", which had been commissioned in response to a mandate
from the G-8 summit in Gleneagles in 2005 (see Bridges
Trade BioRes, 8 July 2005). The report focuses on steps to achieve
environmentally sustainable electricity development, particularly
in Africa, to transition to a lower-carbon economy and to adapt
to climate change. It concludes that the financing gap for the energy
for development and energy access agendas should be met through
energy sector policy reform and to attract the private sector, as
well as through public sector funding. It calls for a global regulatory
framework that would support the transition to a low-carbon economy.
It also stresses the need for enhanced adaptation strategies in
order to achieve progress in fighting poverty.
Meeting on 18
September, the joint IMF-World Bank Development Committee in its
communiqué welcomed progress made under the clean energy
investment framework and asked the Bank to work with other international
organisations to explore financing options to support investment
in clean energy for development and to maximise the use of existing
instruments.
NGOs critical
of Bank energy efforts
A number of
environment and development NGOs, including Friends
of the Earth International, the Institute for Policy Studies and
Oil Change International, said, however, that the Investment
Framework on Clean Energy and Development will neither be effective
at combating climate change nor for expanding energy access for
the poor. The organisations criticised the framework for raising
USD10 billion for conventional energy that have lower greenhouse
gas emissions.
"In continuing
to lend for fossil fuel and dam projects, the World Bank has consistently
missed the social and environmental double dividend that renewable
energy technologies could bring," said Peter Bosshard of International
Rivers Network. Graham Saul of Oil Change International stressed
that "if the World Bank wants to be a positive force in the
fight against climate change then the first step is to stop subsidising
the expansion of the oil industry."
The NGOs instead
recommended an approach based on ending subsidies for fossil fuel
projects, increasing efforts to meet the basic energy needs of the
poor, and redirecting existing energy financing to renewable technologies
and energy efficiency projects via a new Renewable Energy for Development
Agency.
ICTSD reporting;
"World Bank's Clean Energy Plan Sells Climate and Poor People
Short," FOE, 17 September 2006.
|