|
In Brief
STUDY:
MARINE SHIPPING HIGHLY POLLUTING
For the first
time, a study has linked pollution-related illness and mortality
to emissions of seafaring vessels.
Approximately
60,000 lung- and heart-related deaths in 2002 were linked to the
pollution and chemicals emitted by large shipping freighters in
a study by the University of Delaware. According to the researchers,
these deaths were due to the poor regulation of the shipping industry
on fuel standards.
In the last
couple of decades, the international community has taken steps to
reduce other environmental hazards and greenhouse gases, but the
shipping industry has been left largely unregulated. Emissions released
by the diesel fuel in ships have risen, while for buses and trucks
the levels have been reduced by almost 90 percent.
Efficiency and
environmental standards on shipping fuel have not been maintained
over the years due to the distance between the ships and the externalities
they create, explained the study. The freighters travel the open
seas, leagues away from the coastal inhabitants who fall ill. These
chemicals can spread through the water via spills or through the
atmosphere after the fuel is burned for use.
International
shipping accounts for eight percent of global sulphur emissions.
This is unsurprising considering that the industry largely uses
bunker fuel, which is the waste byproduct of distillate oil. Thus
it contains the excess sulphur driven out by the distillation process,
upwards of 2000 times that which is found in highway diesel fuel.
The article
calls on the international community to update shipping standards
in order to better protect the environment and lives of coastal
inhabitants. Those who live near major trade routes will be most
affected, mainly those in South and East Asia and Europe. By 2012,
the study predicts that the death rate is likely to grow by 40 percent.
The UN International
Maritime Organisation is conducting its own investigation and is
planning a series of meetings on the issue over the upcoming months.
Ninety percent
of globally traded goods are transported by the sea, and recent
studies show that emissions are on the rise (see Bridges
Trade BioRes, 2 November 2007).
"Ship Emissions
Causing 60,000 Deaths a Year-Study," PLANET ARK, 8 November
2007; "Environmentalists call for ban on bunker fuel, described
as toxic," SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS, 12 November 2007; "Report
studies shipping emission deaths," GARDEN ISLAND, 10 November
2007.
GREENPEACE:
PALM OIL EXPANSION A PENDING CLIMATE CATASTROPHE
A Greenpeace
report claims that global demand for palm oil is lighting the fuse
of a "climate bomb" in the peat lands of Indonesia. The
slash-and-burn tactics of palm oil farmers is releasing 1.8 billion
tonnes of CO2 per annum from the carbon rich soils of Indonesia's
swamps.
The 22 million
hectares of peat soils of Sumatra have the highest concentration
of carbon in the world. Half have already been consumed by the palm
oil industry. Due to the CO2 emissions resulting from the destruction
of the peat swamps, Indonesia accounts for four percent of global
greenhouse gas emissions. This ranks Indonesia as the third-highest
global emitter of greenhouse gases, just behind the US and China.
Analysts say
that global demand for palm oil will double in 25 years and triple
by 2050. Big name companies like Procter & Gamble, Unilever,
Nestlé, and Kraft are using more and more palm oil in their
products like Pringles, Flora margarine, Kit Kats, and Philadelphia
Cream Cheese. Increasingly, it is also being used in cooking oil
and as a biofuel.
Greenpeace blames
the large firms for the destructive practices used to create palm
oil plantations, but company officials say there is virtually no
traceability for the product.
The projected
increase in demand for biofuels is of highest concern to the group.
Europe plans for biofuel to account for ten percent of all its transport
fuel by 2010, the US by 2020, and China and India expect to use
20 percent biofuels by 2012. Not counting the forest set aside for
cooking oil and other food products, 3 million hectares of land
in Indonesia have also been set aside for biofuel production.
Nearly 15.5
million hectares of plantations will be required to meet Europe's
demand for palm oil alone. In its report, Greenpeace states that
"substituting even ten percent of the world demand for diesel
fuel" will require "more than 75 percent of the world's
total current demand for soya, palm oil, and rapeseed oil."
The report can
be downloaded at http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/reports
"Palm oil
warning for Indonesia," BBC NEWS, 8 November 2007; "Big
companies accused of risking climate catastrophe," GUARDIAN,
8 November 2007.
EU,
SWITZERLAND DISTANT FROM OTHER MEMBERS IN WTO-MEA TALKS
Differences
persist among WTO Members on the content of a potential text that
could serve as the basis for future negotiations on the relationship
between WTO rules and specific trade obligations (STOs) set out
in multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs).
Discussions
on 2 November in the Committee for Trade and Environment - Special
Session (CTE-SS) on an informal compilation prepared by the WTO
Secretariat, of ideas in submissions from Members including Australia,
Argentina, the EU, Taiwan, and the US (see BRIDGES
Weekly, 9 May 2007).
The compilation,
intended to facilitate an outcome from the discussions, was divided
into four parts: Reflecting the Doha mandate; observations drawn
from discussions in the CTE-SS; the importance of domestic co-ordination
in the implementation of MEAs; and dispute settlement.
One delegate
said that dispute settlement was the major bone of contention. The
text on dispute settlement, which drew from an EU submission (TN/TE/W/68,
available at http://docsonline.wto.org),
would have WTO panels seek and defer to MEA expertise while examining
environment-related issues. This met with opposition from developing
countries as well as Australia, Argentina and the US. The EU and
Switzerland supported the idea.
According to
a trade delegate, the 'centre of gravity' appeared to rest with
the Australia-Argentina submission (TN/TE/W/72/Rev.1), which simply
asked the CTE-SS to recommend ways in which Members could structure
specific trade obligations in MEAs to ensure that they and WTO rules
support each other. In contrast, the EU proposal was more ambitious,
as it sought to develop principles for clarifying the relationship
between WTO dispute settlement and MEA trade obligations.
One source said
that the divide seemed to hinge on different interpretations of
the mandate, and hopes for the scope of the outcome.
Chair Ambassador
Mario Matus (Chile) is set to continue consultations to try to bridge
the split between the EU and Switzerland and the rest of the Membership
on the issue.
ICTSD reporting.
TROPICAL
TIMBER ORGANISATION WAITING FOR NEW AGREEMENT TO ENTER INTO FORCE
Delegates at
the forty-third session of the International Tropical Timber Council
(ITTC-43), held from 5-10 November 2007 in Yokohama, Japan, discussed
issues concerning operational, project and policy work for 2008-2009.
Most notably, they discussed the Biennial Work Programme 2008-2009,
which was adopted, and the preparations for entry into force of
the new governing treaty, the International Tropical Timber Agreement
(ITTA), 2006. The Council has committed US$10.1 million for new
projects and activities for the conservation and sustainable management,
use and trade of tropical forest resources.
The Council
also reviewed the status of the ITTA, 2006, which has only been
ratified by four countries - the US, Malaysia, Switzerland and Poland
- but which must be ratified by 10 consumer and 12 producer countries
before it enters into force. The ratification process is complex
and lengthy, and not a top priority for many members. Because of
uncertainty over when the ITTA, 2006 will enter into force, some
important decisions were put on hold. For example, a new action
plan for ITTO work under the ITTA, 2006 were ultimately left hanging.
Some expressed that it was too soon to conclude work on issues pertaining
to the new Agreement because it has not entered into force. The
members therefore gave priority to smaller and more immediate matters.
They decided to host a high-level meeting in Accra, Ghana from 2-5
June 2008, to review and clarify the operational issues needed to
be considered on the entry into force of the new agreement.
The ITTA, 2006
builds on the foundations of the previous agreements and focuses
on the world tropical timber economy and the sustainable management
of the resource base, simultaneously encouraging the timber trade
and improving forest management. It also allows for the consideration
of non-tropical timber issues as they relate to tropical timber.
The Council
is the governing body of the International Tropical Timber Organisation
(ITTO). It meets regularly to discuss a wide-ranging agenda aimed
at promoting sustainable tropical forest management and the trade
of sustainably produced tropical timber.
For more information
on the 43rd Council session or ITTO in general, visit http://www.itto.or.jp
For daily reporting
and a summary of the meeting, see IISD's Earth Negotiations Bulletin
at http://www.iisd.ca/forestry/itto/ittc43/
ICTSD reporting.
|