High-Level
Regional Policy Dialogues on
"Globalisation and Liberalisation which Promotes Sustainable Human Development
(SHD)"
--Asia Dialogue--
Bangkok,
Thailand 24-26 November 1999
Description
| Programme
| Participants
| Documentation
| Outcomes
| Dialogues
Home
Outcomes
The
Asia Dialogue is the second in a series of high- level regional policy-dialogues
in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, that mobilized a select group of leaders
from academia, business and industry, government and non-governmental
organizations to strengthen policy coherence between SHD objectives and
economic integration and trade liberalization paths. The recommendations
of the group are provided as an input to the Preparatory Committee of
the Whole for UNCTAD X and suggest ways in which the Conference could
address the issue of promoting developing countries. interests and SHD
objectives while assisting their integration into the world economy.
Diagnosis
The
nineties have seen intensification in the rapid insertion of most Asian
domestic economies into the emerging global economy, characterized by
liberalized trade in goods and services and highly mobile capital.
East Asian countries entered the decade with aggressive export-led
growth strategies. Other
major regional players, namely, India and China, pursued over the nineties
a rather different growth trail featuring gradual domestic market strengthening
and export promotion strategies. As the decade ends, most countries in
the region seem determined to thrive as they admirably bounce back from
the massive financial withdraw of 1998. Real GDP growth rates range, eg.,
from 12.3% in the 3rd quarter of 1999 for South Korea to 3.5%
for Thailand in the 2nd quarter; and the average annual inflation
rate is running at less than 2% in the East-Asia four (Malaysia, Philippines,
Korea and Thailand) and is in single digits in Indonesia after peaking
at 80% at the end of 1998; industrial production growth is also strong.
The regional picture for poverty, education, and health is one of stalled
progress. According to recent estimates for the East Asia and Pacific
region, excluding China, after reducing the number of people living on
less than USD 1 a day from 417.5 m in 1987 to 265.1 m in 1996, the figure
rose in 1998 to an estimated 278.3 m. In South Asia the figure has risen
from 474.4 m in 1987 to an estimated 522.0 m in 1998. Public expenditure on health
and education as a percentage of GDP for 1994-5 and 1998-99 comparisons
has dropped or remained constant in East Asia, with the exception of Thailand
where education spending rose when the crisis hit. In this scenario, the
over-riding compulsion to eradicate poverty, to confront the demographics
of aging populations, and to provide social safety nets to secure sustained
growth dynamics, are more pressing than ever.
East/South-East Asian economies have used opportunities offered by globalization
and this process seems to have been facilitated by significant liberalization
of trade policy regimes which started in the mid-1980s. However, participants
at the Dialogue noted that this drive favoured the 'corporate. economy'
formed by large-scale and established enterprises at the cost of the 'self-sustaining'
economy -- small-scale producers or those engaged in direct extraction
of natural resources -- owing to the greater responsiveness of the former
to market-driven and regulatory measures.
It also transpired from the debate that changes in competition intensity
and world trade patterns due to China's WTO accession would directly affect
SHD in the region. Poverty, income distribution and other SHD variables
would be negatively impacted in countries that lose domestic and international
market share to China and other strong and growing economies in the region,
as well as lose opportunities to receive capital, technology, management
and technical know-how through diverted FDI. China's expected greater
openness will also offer opportunities which need to be better explored.
Recommendations
The
following are recommendations for developing countries. international
and domestic strategies to achieve SHD objectives. They argue that international
economic integration and trade liberalization reinforces the need for:
·
Rationalizing
policy interventions
by
asking how a particular international trade or economic integration framework
impinges on but can also promote sustainable development. Policy interventions
in exporting sectors should distinguish among discreet policy goals .
including poverty alleviation, income distribution, human development,
and social capital. Also, the instruments used to achieve these goals
should make clear reference to the type of occupation and to unregistered
or officially unrecognized activities. It should be emphasized that interpreting
SHD as an aggregation of goals is a problem that besets equally all attempts
to optimally modify policy and market failures under globalization by
any of the means usually proposed . direct controls and centralized decision-making
at one extreme and pricing schemes, such as taxes and subsidies, at the
other. Participants noted that, as it attempts to see globalization and
SHD somehow as wholes that are greater than the sum of their parts, society
may have a difficult task of choosing among a set, and, sometimes, a substantial
set of otherwise discrete goals and associated policy interventions.
·
Promoting
gradual and assisted introduction of competition in developing country
markets to protect the weakest
by
negotiating agreements to enhance the competitive edge of smaller producers
who are threatened by international competition due to new global technologies
and the process of international trade. Policy interventions should undertake
analysis of governance structures to justify the application of particular
policy instruments. For instance, trade-related incentives as used in
domestic interventions may be presented as neutral economic or financial
instruments, but in practice, they tend to favour the modern, large-scale
sector (in the South as well as the North) which have preferential access
to credit, technology and government resources. Those favoured belong
to a . corporate. economy and the majority who are immediately excluded
from the opportunities that such actions might create belong to a class
of smaller producers. Commodity chain analysis can help to identify at
each step of a production chain who is likely to benefit the most, who
is likely to be hurt the most, and, if there is surplus revenue, how can
it be used to bring about the desired industrial transition. Two key issues
must be borne in mind. First, how to use the governing structure within
each segment of the chain, and in particular how to ensure that the policy
initiatives enable those who take such decisions to respond and implement
them. Second, how to ensure that the result will be equitable and efficient;
in other words, how to strengthen and transform governance structures
towards this objective.
·
Adjusting
allocative priorities among economic sectors at the domestic level
by changing policy frameworks and current expenditure commitments to promote
social capital and higher labour productivity. Among others, export-led
strategies must recognize that gains in per capita income are contingent
upon investment in human development (health, nutrition and education,
mainly) as well as productivity investments. In particular, investments
in such areas as equipment and production methods, upgrading work conditions
and skills, and removal of gender biases would strengthen the Asian countries.
export prices and terms of trade. Whilst experience has shown that investments
in health (biomedical technology, population and environmental policies)
positively influence such principal areas of SHD as poverty eradication
and advancement of employment and sustainable livelihoods, one of the
merits of the Asia Dialogue was that it argued direct increased benefits
to outward-orientation from investment in health.
To complement any structural advantages, including demographic
ones from the contribution to productivity that comes from the population
growth and age structure of an economy, Asian countries could affect technological
change, terms of trade, increase savings, improve time preference rates
and even bring about favourable adjustments to world interest rates through
investment in the health of their populations.
·
Enhancing
governance on investment rules
by promoting sectoral strategies that make effective use of the package
of benefits offered by foreign direct investment (capital, technology,
management, technical know how, etc.). These will need investing in social
absorption capabilities of host countries (eg., availability of skilled
labour, technological infrastructure, social capital) in order to enhance
the contribution of SHD-friendly FDI, and social safety nets to keep financial
spillovers in check. Recent studies undertaken for UNCTAD have demonstrated
evidence that this ability or endogenous capability to assimilate and
take advantage of technology inputs is created by good macro-economic
policies, an adequate institutional setting, the availability of skilled
human resources, and efficient management and organizational routines
at the firm level. Participants recommended investments in particular
in human resource training, technological infrastructure, and domestic
measures, including approaches that use governance structures (see second
recommendation above), to increase the competitiveness of local suppliers.
The contribution of multinational corporations (MNCs) in this area also
depends on MNC strategies, market orientation, structures, technological
and environmental practices, etc. Participants recommended that strategies
for obtaining 'desirable FDI' should involve government incentives
as well as indigenous social capital (natural environment, cultural environment,
social relations and civil society, etc.) and indigenous entrepreneurs
in MNC-driven partnership and community development projects. Examples
of the former include tax incentives from national governments or points
of . merit. to be earned by companies (eg., points given by intergovernmental
organizations).
·
Promoting
fair trade and sustainable development in GATT/WTO
by
overhauling Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) through a logical
economic basis that recognizes hard linkages between trade and investment
policies and the causes of poverty, natural resource use and broader factors
of social welfare. Attempts to establish statistical causation between
exports and growth have had mixed success, and there are strong arguments
that rapid liberalization in developing countries helped by anachronistic
SDT will not bring about SHD. For example, liberalization-induced specialization
in a subset of product ranges may have a positive net effect on the environment/health
if expanding sectors are less polluting on average than contracting import-competing
sectors, and negative if the opposite relation holds. Also, as this .
composition. effect will shift as comparative advantages in . dirty. production
shift, it is by no means guaranteed that the next generation of higher-income
or least-developed countries will benefit from structural changes that
have helped countries contract polluting production. Similarly, in the
present setting of new technology, new financial instruments, and multinational
firm growth, it is trickier for governments to impose effective capital
controls, harder to erect effective trade barriers, and more difficult
to anticipate financial spillovers into the real economy via wages, food
prices, interest rates for small businesses, etc. Moreover, as the financial
crises in East Asia and Russia have shown, the benefits of globalization
may be lost quickly, while the high stakes of commercial, political and
legal, cross-cultural and currency/financial risks remain.
·
Beyond GATT/WTO:
controlling external shocks and poverty by providing
the poor with insurance and credit against the irreversible effects that
imperfect capital markets and lasting economic downturns can have on health,
schooling and nutrition. Participants noted that while there
is general agreement on national-level pre-emptive steps to moderate the
impact of future crises under globalization,
there is no consensus on international or regional level actions. At the
regional level, participants highlighted the need for a lender of last
resort, comprehensive global financial supervision and regulation, design
of orderly debt renegotiations, and an Asian Fund. Financing commitments
are also required for supply-side
strengthening, diversification, export capacities, and human and technological
capacities that would reduce impacts
on poverty due to countries.
reliance on primary commodity exports, their vulnerability to price variability
in international
markets, and variability in external finance.
|