|

|
 |
| |
THE
DOMESTIC POLITICS OF THE EU AND US AGRICULTURE REFORM: PROSPECTS
FOR HONG KONG
|
Organised
by ICTSD
Geneva,
Switzerland, 24 October 2005
|
Description | Programme
| Participants
|
Documentation
Description
Negotiations
on agriculture are presently in a critical phase with intense pressure
on WTO Members to come to an agreement on critical modalities in the
three agricultural pillars of market access, domestic-support and export
competition. The positions of the two heavyweights in international
agricultural trade-the US and the EU-will be a critical determinant
of forward movement for the entire agricultural negotiations and thereby
the entire Doha Round. It is therefore critical for WTO Members and
other stakeholders to understand and appreciate the dynamic and complex
factors shaping US and EU farm policies and in order to assess what
may be a realistic and feasible outcome for the WTO Hong Kong Ministerial
conference.
To enable such an understanding and appreciation amongst stakeholders,
this dialogue was jointly convened by ICTSD and the German Marshall
Fund of the United States (GMFUS). The meeting aimed at providing insights
into the political processes and realities that shape decisions on market
access, domestic support and domestic policy reform. It looked at the
priorities for policy making in the EU and US in the run up to Hong
Kong and highlighted how the US farm bill and the EU CAP reform might
affect the negotiating position and flexibilities of the EU and US in
the run up to Hong Kong. The speakers addressed the impacts of the respective
policies on the multilateral trading system and specifically on the
current Doha negotiations and also discussed subsequent effects on worldwide
agriculture and sustainable development goals.
Professor Robert L. Thompson, Chair of the International Food and Agriculture
Trade Policy Council addressed US domestic farm policies while Mr. Peter
Thompson, Deputy Permanent Representative, Permanent Delegation of the
European Commission to the WTO, shared political insights on the EU
agriculture reform. The presentations were followed by a moderated discussion
amongst participants.
|
|
 |

|