ICTSD BRIDGES   

 

 

 

      Top Story
   Volume 4    Number 47  12 December 2000   

GOVERNMENTS AGREE TO BAN OR LIMIT 'DIRTY DOZEN' POPS

Following a week of negotiations lasting well into the last night, delegates from 122 countries on early Sunday morning agreed to ban 12 highly toxic, long-lasting chemicals known as persistent organic pollutants (POPs). The Fifth Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5) for an International Legally Binding Instrument for Implementing International Action on Certain Persistent Organic Pollutants, meeting in Johannesburg, South Africa on 4-10 December, thereby concluded a two-and-a-half year long process. Four out of the 'Dirty Dozen' (the 12 chemical substances covered by the new convention) -- namely DDT, PCBs, dioxins and furans -- were treated with exemptions from the total ban imposed on the other eight. The resulting agreement was hailed from all sides, with governments, industry, and environmentalists seeing their interests respected in the treaty. Compromises were achieved on the inclusion of the precautionary principle to the agreement and also for the channelling of the funds for technical assistance for developing countries.

One of the most contentious issues was the introduction of a "precautionary approach" for adding toxic substances to the list of banned substances despite the absence of scientific certainty. The EU promoted the idea with the argument that where there is scientific evidence of a threat to wildlife, human health or the environment, protective measures should be taken even without full scientific certainty. The US, together with Japan and Australia, argued that the draft treaty was already flexible enough and explicitly addressing precaution would not add anything to the agreement. The conference finally settled on an inclusion of precaution as guiding principle to the treaty.

The Global Environment Facility (GEF) was entrusted with the operations of the financial mechanism designed to assist developing countries in achieving the convention's objectives. For this purpose, the GEF will be strengthened once the treaty is ratified. Developing countries had been asking for a mandatory special fund, and were not satisfied at first with developed countries' pledges. Finally both sides agreed to a compromise that does not include any mandatory obligations for developed countries. In particular, numerous obsolete stockpiles of POPs found in developing countries remain a cause of great concern, and delegates pointed out that financial and technical assistance from developed parties will be necessary to ensure their elimination.

While the ban on the pesticides aldrin, endrin, chlordane, dieldrin, heptachlor, mirex, and toxaphene, as well as the industrial chemical hexachlorobenzene were not disputed, the treatment of DDT heated up the discussion considerably. Health officials and delegates from developing countries that had faced an escalation of malaria cases in the past few years (e.g. South Africa and India) stressed that DDT still has an important role to play in saving lives through its effectiveness in controlling malarial mosquitoes. Only three countries (Mexico, India and China) still produce the substance, considered to be the cause of several medical problems, while most developed countries banned the domestic use of DDT several years ago.

Under pressure from developing countries, the conference granted a phase-out period of up to 2025 for governments to replace polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in existing facilities such as electrical transformers. Although PCBs are no longer produced, hundreds of thousands of tons are still in use in such equipment. Dioxins and furans, which are mainly produced unintentionally due to incomplete combustion, were not banned completely after the US asserted that it would not be possible to eliminate all sources of these substances due to technical reasons. The convention states, however, that emissions should be reduced as much as possible, and where practicable should be ultimately eliminated.

Questioned on how the new agreement handled trade concerns, John Buccini, the Canadian Chairman of the conference, stated that the provisions did not contravene WTO rules, as potential trade conflicts had been discussed throughout the negotiations and that trade experts had assured delegates that was no conflict.

The convention will be formally signed on 22-23 May 2001 in Stockholm and enters into force once at least 50 countries ratify the agreement. This process is expected to take three to four years.

POPs are highly stable chemical compounds that can last for years or decades before breaking down. They have been linked to an array of adverse effects, including death, cancer and birth defects among humans and animals. They can travel thousands of miles from their original source and accumulate in fatty tissues of animals and humans.

"Weltweites Verbot von Umweltgiften", NZZ, 11 December 2000; "Global accord bans 12 toxic chemicals", FT, 10 December 2000; "Toxic chemical treaty in sight despite EU-US dispute", REUTERS, 8 December 2000; "POPs: US Confident Of Deal On Toxic Chemicals Treaty", UN WIRE, 8 December 2000; "UPDATE - Talks start on accord to ban toxic chemical output", REUTERS, 5 December 2000; "UN conference on toxic chemicals seeks global ban", REUTERS, 5 December 2000; "POPs: International Conference To Finalise Treaty Opens Today", UN WIRE, 4 December 2000; "Toxic Legacy Rests With POPs Treaty Negotiators", ENS, 4 December 2000; "Toepfer Urges Agreement on Global Treaty o Protect Health, Environment From Persistent Organic Pollutants", UNEP NEWS RELEASE, 9 November 2000; ICTSD Internal Files.

Back to  

      Index Next Story

ICTSD Home | News Digest | Calendar | Publications | Virtual Bridges | Mailbox
About ICTSD | Contact Info | Info Search | SiteMap

Copyright 1997 International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, All rights reserved.