Developing
Countries Advocate New Negotiating Areas At WTO
Twelve developing
countries from the Like Minded Group (LMG) circulated on 18 September
a set of 'non-trade related' initiatives they are pushing to have
included on the agenda for the Fourth Ministerial Conference in
Doha, Qatar, currently scheduled for 9-13 November.
Clarifying items
previously touched on in the leadup to the failed Seattle Ministerial
Conference in 1999, the initiatives consist of four proposals that
advocate the launching of negotiations for a Framework Agreement
on Special and Differential Treatment (S&D) and the establishment
of Working Groups on trade and technology transfer, trade and debt,
and trade and finance. (A more detailed analysis of this report
in context of overall implementation issues is forthcoming in the
monthly BRIDGES Between Sustainable Development, available at http://www.ictsd.org;
also see BRIDGES Weekly, 24 July 2001, http://www.ictsd.org/html/weekly/24-07-01/story1.htm).
According to
the LMG proposal on S&D, the initiative seeks to build a long-term
agenda for developing countries, building off their demands for
fuller implementation and re-balancing of the WTO Agreements, which
many see as flawed and favouring the interests of developed country
Members. The inputs were timed to come out just in advance of an
expected paper from General Council Chairman Stuart Harbinson dealing
with possible topics for the Ministerial declaration (see related
story, this issue), and were drafted by Cuba, the Dominican Republic,
Honduras, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Malaysia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka,
Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe.
The four proposals
are assigned differing levels of priority. The paper on S&D
calls for the establishment of negotiations towards a framework
agreement at Doha; the Ministerial should also establish a Working/Negotiating
Group on trade and technology transfer, and a Working Group on trade
and debt, pointing to a pre-negotiations step for the latter. A
Working Group on trade and finance is called for, though the proposal
does not specify that this should be established at the Doha Ministerial.
Special and
Differential Treatment
The Framework
Agreement on S&D states that "the concept of Special and
Differential Treatment is a fundamental building block of the multilateral
trading system" and that "the WTO must demonstrate sensitivity
to developmental objectives of [the] majority of its Membership
and to sustain credibility."
"In the
immediate/short term, all the existing [S&D] treatment provisions
in various WTO agreements should be operationalised/implemented."
It goes on to say that "many of the Implementation proposals
submitted by developing countries, in the backdrop of uneven growth
and development in the years following the establishment of the
WTO, can be viewed as an initial endeavour for extension and elaboration
of enhanced, effective and a binding [S&D] regime."
Inter alia,
the proponents say that Members shall undertake an evaluation of
the implications of any future agreement, with respect to implementation
costs in terms of financial impacts, capacity building, and technical
assistance. They also advocate that transition periods for the implementation
of WTO Agreements must be linked to objective economic and social
criteria.
Trade and technology
transfer
Acknowledging
the challenge for the international trading system to address the
issue of the transfer of technology to developing countries to ensure
that they become equal partners in the global efforts for world
prosperity, the trade and technology transfer paper recommends the
formation of a working/negotiating group that would primarily study
how to strengthen provisions in WTO Agreements that seek to promote
developing countries' access to modern technology and explore changes
to these provisions.
The proposal
notes that developed countries have yet to fully implement areas
of the WTO Agreements referring to technology transfer, in particular
GATS Article IV.2, TRIPs Articles 7,8, and 66.2, the TBT Preamble,
and SPS Article 9.1. Inter alia, it suggests that industrialised
countries could implement tax incentives spurring companies to invest
in technology transfer initiatives in developing countries.
Trade and debt
With respect
to trade and debt, the proposed Working Group would study the implications
of developing countries' debt burdens and in particular, study the
tying of specific debt levels with exceptions to implementing market
access commitments in goods and services. As well, it looks to set
specific debt levels which could also trigger special and differential
treatment.
Trade and finance
The least specific
of the proposals is that on trade and finance, which draws attention
to such issues as institutional measures that need to be taken to
facilitate greater and more effective developing country participation
in WTO proceedings. Inter alia, the paper calls for the examination
of the trade implications of exchange rate instability and the impact
of balance of trade payments on a country-by-country basis.
One commentator
notes that these proposals could potentially be seen as a means
for enabling trade-offs for accepting developed country initiatives
on non-trade items such as investment, environment, and competition
policy, though many developing countries insist that implementation
issues should not be linked to these 'new round' issues.
According to
trade sources, developed countries are expected to come out with
a proposal on implementation that builds on a previous Quad (Canada,
the EC, Japan and the US) paper that failed to meet developing country
expectations in areas such as subsides, textiles and anti- dumping
(see BRIDGES Weekly, 18 September 2001, http://www.ictsd.org/weekly/01-09-18/wtoinbrief.htm#1).
At press time,
industrialised countries had not yet responded to the LMG's proposals.
Presumably, their position will emerge as a text on implementation
is expected by the next special session of the General Council on
implementation on 3 October.
"Developing
Countries Propose New Negotiating Areas For Doha" Inside US
Trade, 21 September 2001; Internal ICTSD Files.
|