 |
NEW
DEADLINE SET FOR DSU NEGOTIATIONS
WTO Members
have agreed on an end-May 2004 deadline for reforming the Dispute
Settlement Understanding (DSU). The special session of the Dispute
Settlement Body (DSB) missed its deadline on 31 May this year for
completing the reform (see BRIDGES
Weekly, 4 June 2003), and has been meeting informally since
then. The new deadline was agreed at an informal meeting on 10 July,
and formally adopted at the General Council at its 24-25 July meeting
(see related story, this issue). Members had disagreed on the scope
of negotiations. While a number of Members wanted to base negotiations
solely on a text circulated by Chair Péter Balás (Hungary)
in late May, the US and EU preferred to see some of their proposals
included or better reflected in the text. Members ended up agreeing
on the latter option, leaving the text open to additional proposals.
ICTSD reporting;
"WTO Members Set to Agree on May 2004 Deadline for Dispute
Reform Negotiations," WTO REPORTER, 18 July 2003.
CAMBODIA'S
TOUGH WTO MEMBERSHIP NEGOTIATIONS COMPLETED
The WTO working
party handling Cambodia's membership negotiation on 22 July adopted
its accession package, which contains Cambodia's commitments under
various WTO agreements, and its promises on market access for goods
and services. The US, India and Panama were the last Members to
sign the bilateral agreements with Cambodia, following agreements
with the EU, Japan and others (see BRIDGES
Weekly, 15 July 2003). The final decision approving Cambodia's
membership will be made at the fifth WTO Ministerial Conference
in Cancún on 10-14 September, and Cambodia will become a
Member 30 days after ratifying the agreement. According to Working
Party Chair Meloni and Cham Prasidh, Cambodian Minister of Commerce,
the WTO membership will provide Cambodia the opportunity to fully
integrate into the world economy. However, the Cambodian Minister
stressed that the accession process had been difficult, and some
observers commented that the package of concessions and commitments
went far beyond what was commensurate with the level of development
of an LDC like Cambodia. Indeed, the terms of accession accepted
by Cambodia go beyond what applies to existing WTO LDC Members (See
BRIDGES Monthly, June
2003). For example, Cambodia has committed to applying the Agreement
on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights no later
than 1 January 2007, while existing LDC WTO Members were granted
a 10-year transition period for their introduction. In addition,
Cambodia will bind its agricultural export subsidies at zero, and
will not maintain or apply any export subsidies for agricultural
products. After the approval of the final package, the Malaysian
delegation expressed "deep regret" over the "onerous
demands made by Members to acceding countries like Cambodia".
ICTSD reporting.
|
 |