 |
SINGAPORE
ISSUES: STAUNCH OPPOSITION, NEW AFRICAN PROPOSAL
Opposition to
commencing talks on the so called Singapore issues -- investment,
competition, trade facilitation and transparency in government procurement
-- remains strong among many WTO Members as the date for the Cancun
Ministerial Conference draws near. An informal Heads of Delegation
(HOD) consultation on 15 August failed to bridge Members' sharply
polarised positions. General Council Chair Ambassador Carlos Perez
del Castillo (Uruguay) said work on modalities on the Singapore
issues had to be moved to the General Council level, as the Working
Groups had not touched on this issue. He added that their mandate
was to "develop modalities for the consideration of the Ministers".
Acknowledging the need to develop substantive and not just procedural
modalities, he tried to guide the session into a discussion of the
specific modalities of each issue. The discussions were reportedly
politically charged -- especially those on investment. There was
little agreement on the substance of each issue, nor on how to treat
the issues in general.
While demandeurs
of talks, including the EU and Japan, consider the Doha mandate
to imply that negotiations will to start after Cancun and a decision
on modalities has to be taken, many other Members disagree. More
consultations by the Chair, with the "Friends of the Chair,"
are set to follow.
African countries
oppose negotiations
Also at the
15 August HOD meeting, Kenya, on behalf of eleven African countries
(Benin, Botswana, Kenya, Mauritius, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone,
Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe) presented a paper outlining
their position on a decision on the Singapore issues. The paper
also contains the countries' proposed text on these issues, to be
included in the draft Cancun Ministerial text (see WT/GC/W/510,
searchable at http://docsonline.wto.org).
The submission clearly indicates the unwillingness of these countries
to begin negotiations on the Singapore issues, reflecting the views
of a larger group of developing and least-developed countries including
the African, Caribbean and Pacific group as well as India, Egypt,
Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Cuba, Venezuela and Bangladesh (see
BRIDGES Weekly,
17 July 2003). Many of these countries supported the Kenyan paper
at the HOD meeting.
The paper also
follows the line taken on these issues in an ACP ministerial "Declaration
on the Fifth Ministerial Conference of the WTO," adopted in
Brussels on 1 August as well as the declaration from an African
Union meeting in Mauritius on 20 June and the Dhaka Declaration
adopted at the Second LDC Trade Ministers' Meeting at the beginning
of June. The text notes the "peculiar aspects and complexities"
of each Singapore issue and that WTO Members "...had not reached
a common multilateral context."
Recognising
the concerns of many developing countries about the potential serious
implications of these issues on their economies, the African paper
goes on to add that "the benefits of negotiating a multilateral
framework for each of these issues is not evident to them."
It further notes that "many developing countries have scarce
resources and limited capacity to meaningfully negotiate these issues,
especially as they grapple with implementation of existing WTO rules
and the expanded work programme after the Doha Ministerial Conference."
Consequently "...the situation did not provide a basis for
commencement of negotiations in these areas" and called for
a continuation of the clarification exercise on these issues in
their respective working groups. The paper is indicative of the
concerns of most African countries, as well as many other developing
countries, about the unclear development implications of these issues
apart from the strain put on their existing negotiating and implementing
capacities.
Thailand,
Chile, link investment and agriculture talks
While developing
countries have not officially linked agreement to negotiate the
Singapore issues -- individually or as a group -- to progress in
other negotiating bodies, many trade sources have pointed to the
link (see BRIDGES Weekly,
28 July 2003). Reportedly, Cairns group members Thailand and Chile
made the link between investment and agriculture at the informal
HOD meeting of August 15. According to sources, they indicated their
willingness to open negotiations on investment provided there was
progress on agriculture. South Africa stressed that Ministers at
Doha had deliberately sequenced negotiations in order to ensure
that developing countries' issues were addressed first. Therefore
agreement on implementation issues, S&D, TRIPS and public health,
agriculture, non-agricultural market access should come first and
only then on Singapore issues.
EC, Japan
prepare draft texts on modalities
According to
trade sources, the EC and Japan have prepared draft texts on the
modalities of the Singapore issues, which however have not yet been
submitted to the WTO. These texts place the Singapore issues within
the single undertaking and set a 1 January 2005 deadline for completing
negotiations. The texts reportedly include 'organisation and management'
among the procedural elements for modalities. On substance, the
Japan text states that the review and clarification work carried
out so far forms the basis for the negotiations.
The EU and Japanese
texts consider the issues listed in the Doha Declaration and their
subsequent clarification as sufficient to constitute substantive
modalities. This is not a view shared by many developing countries,
who want to see a sufficient degree of convergence and clarification
on the substantive aspects of the issues themselves, as well as
additional aspects, before taking a potential decision on modalities.
Both the Japan and EU texts reiterate their commitment to technical
assistance and capacity building during and after the negotiations,
and the EU paper also reportedly states that the negotiations "shall"
take fully into account the principle of special and differential
treatment for developing and least developed countries.
ICTSD reporting;
"WTO Members Remain Polarised On Singapore Issues", THIRD
WORLD NETWORK, 17 August 2003; "EC AND Japan's New Draft Texts
On Singapore Issues Modalities For Cancun", THIRD WORLD NETWORK,
6 August 2003.
|
 |