|
TRADE
COMMUNITY SEARCHES FOR WAY FORWARD IN DOHA TALKS AS LAMY TAKES HELM
Pascal Lamy
formally took over as Director-General of the WTO on 1 September.
The former EU Trade Commissioner faces a formidable challenge: goading
increasingly recalcitrant WTO Members into reviving the faltering
Doha Round negotiations. Speaking to the press after taking the
helm of the global trade body, Lamy reminded them that "Member
states have the decision-making power" in the WTO, and that
he had no "magic wand" to ensure success. "We can
catalyse, we can broker," he continued, "sometimes, sometimes
we can lead, but at the end of the day, they take the decision."
Trade negotiators
and observers are searching for potential ways to move forward in
the ongoing Doha Round trade talks after Members' failure to meet
an end-July target date for reaching agreement on pivotal negotiating
issues (see BRIDGES Weekly,
3 August 2005).
Negotiators:
agriculture will determine progress
Geneva-based
trade diplomats are girding themselves for what promises to be an
intensive three months of discussions in the run-up to the WTO's
Hong Kong Ministerial Conference in December. Several delegates
said that progress in the talks would be impossible without a breakthrough
in the deadlocked farm trade negotiations -- a breakthrough that
would depend entirely on the US and the EU working out some sort
of agreement between themselves on export subsidies, support to
domestic production, and market access. The EU would have to come
out in writing with their ideas on market access and domestic support,
one delegate suggested, and the US would have to put forward some
suggestions on food aid as opposed to merely defending its existing
policies. An indication of meaningful progress on agriculture, it
was thought, would spur progress on non-agricultural market access
(NAMA) and services.
In one negotiator's
view, progress on agriculture must be incremental, "step-by-step,"
in order to give developing country governments, with their limited
capacity, enough time to make complex assessments about how they
would be affected. 'Big bangs' of eleventh-hour concessions delivered
in a take-it-or-leave-it fashion would likely end up being detrimental
to the interests of poor countries.
Expert group,
Blair underline importance of aid-for-trade
Opinions on
how to achieve success in the Doha Round negotiations have not been
limited to trade diplomats. British Prime Minister Tony Blair wrote
in the 5 September edition of the Financial Times that "it
should be possible at Hong Kong to set a deadline of 2010"
for the end of agricultural export subsidies. He also called for
more aid to build African countries' capacity to take part in international
trade, and for "allowing them to determine their own economic
policies."
A more detailed
set of proposals of how the talks could successfully respond to
developmental concerns came from a group of trade experts convened
by the UK Department for International Development (DFID), and chaired
by former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo. The paper, which was
circulated on 6 September to the ministers and Geneva missions of
all WTO Member states, warns of a looming impasse in the Doha Round
talks. It suggests that governments must "openly recognise
and explicitly address" domestic adjustment costs, and garner
support for substantial multilateral liberalisation on the basis
that it would yield global gains that far exceed the losses that
it would inflict. Subsequently, countries would need to set up mechanisms
-- within and outside the multilateral trading system -- to enable
'loser' groups to adjust, in order for liberalisation to yield benefits
across the world.
The panel suggested
that a potential crisis resulting from conflicting interests could
be averted if rich WTO Members substantially increased and institutionalised
'aid-for-trade' to boost their poorer counterparts' competitiveness
and productivity. Developed countries would also have to agree to
compensate developing ones outside the WTO for costs resulting from
multilateral trade liberalisation, both financially and in terms
of broader support to help developing countries identify and attain
their trade-related objectives.
The group proposed
that the uncomfortable issue of preference erosion could be addressed
by having preference-granting countries provide beneficiary countries
with additional bilateral development assistance equal to the "assessed
value" of their preference schemes. They also urged governments
to make data on trade policies, such as applied tariffs, antidumping
measures and product standards, openly available free of charge,
arguing that it would facilitate the analysis of the potential developmental
impacts of different policies.
Agriculture
week moved forward by two weeks
Six major business
groups from the US, the EU, Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Australia
issued a joint statement on 6 September warning that the Doha Round
talks were "on the verge of collapse. A failure to reach a
deal at Hong Kong, they say, "may have serious consequences
for worldwide economic growth and development and has the potential
of striking a critical blow to the heart of the current round."
The organisations suggested that sectoral approaches could speed
up liberalisation in both NAMA and services, and called for "deep
and comprehensive tariff reductions" on industrial goods. Echoing
the sentiments of several Member delegations, the business leaders'
statement said that "the failure to resolve key issues in agriculture
is seriously stifling progress in other areas."
In response
to this sense of urgency around the farm trade negotiations, the
group's new chair, Ambassador Crawford Falconer of New Zealand,
brought forward its first session of the autumn by almost two weeks.
The special (negotiating) session of the Committee on Agriculture
will thus meet from 13-16 September, instead of 26-30 September
as originally planned.
Meanwhile, Lamy
announced that he was starting consultations with members of the
WTO Secretariat, the chairs of the negotiating groups, trade envoys
and regional groupings. He has promised to make a statement with
"more precise views" about the negotiations at the 14
September meeting of the Trade Negotiations Committee.
Documents for
the Project on Development and the Global Trade Architecture are
available at http://www.ycsg.yale.edu/core/global_trade_architecture.html.
The business
groups' statement is available at http://www.businessroundtable.org/pdf/20050905003WBLGJointStatement.pdf.
ICTSD reporting;
"Alarm bells raised over WTO talks," GLOBE AND MAIL, 6
September 2005; " Dates for Next Round of WTO Agriculture Talks
Moved Up by Chairman," WTO REPORTER, 2 September 2005; "Gleneagles
must be one step in a longer campaign," FINANCIAL TIMES, 5
September 2005; "A test of Pascal Zorro," FINANCIAL TIMES,
1 September 2005.
|