|
ANTI-DUMPING
ACTIVITY CONTINUES DECLINE: WTO SECRETARIAT
The number of
anti-dumping investigations as well as that of anti-dumping measures
actually imposed continued a pattern of decline over the first half
of 2005, according to the WTO Secretariat. According to the 24 October
report, only 96 new anti-dumping investigations were launched between
January and June 2005, compared to 106 over the same period for
the previous year. A similar decline was seen in the number of cases
where anti-dumping measures were implemented, which fell from 58
cases to 53.
The WTO Secretariat
report is the latest in a series of announcements that have shown
anti-dumping activity to be decreasing since 2003 (see BRIDGES Weekly,
30 October 2003; and
22 April 2004).
Countries in
Asia led the pack as the target of new anti-dumping investigations
with China, Taiwan and India placed as first, second and third respectively.
The developed country most often accused of dumping its exports
was the US, which placed fourth on the list of countries facing
anti-dumping investigations. The report cited plastics, chemicals
and base metals as the most frequent subject of new investigations.
South Africa
led Members by launching 17 new anti-dumping investigations -- twelve
more than reported for the same period in 2004. However, an increase
in the value of the country's currency may be partly responsible
for this increase.
While the number
of anti-dumping measures actually applied by Members during the
first half of 2005 declined, the figure for both the US (13 measures)
and China (10 measures) more than doubled. Out of the 53 newly initiated
measures, 29 came from developing countries.
Trade analysts
suggest that the decrease in anti-dumping activity -- particularly
new anti-dumping investigations -- in recent years may be attributable
to the fact that a round of negotiations is currently underway.
ICTSD reporting,
"WTO Secretariat Reports Continuing Declines in Both New Anti-Dumping
Investigations and New Final Anti-Dumping Measures," WTO PRESS
RELEASE, 24 October 2005.
DSU
REVIEW EFFECTIVELY ON HOLD
Negotiations
to improve and clarify the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding
(DSU) are effectively on hold, according to trade diplomats who
attended the 24 October session of the Dispute Settlement Body Special
Session (DSB-SS).
Delegates reported
that more pressing areas of the ongoing talks, such as agriculture,
non-agricultural market access (NAMA) and services have drawn Members'
attention away from the Doha-mandated DSU review. This was reinforced
at the meeting when the sponsors of a proposal on special and differential
treatment (S&D) indicated that they would be unable to initiate
a discussion on it until after the WTO's December Ministerial Conference
in Hong Kong, because their resources would be dedicated to other
issues until then.
As in past meetings,
Chair Ambassador David Spencer of Australia reiterated that delegates
need to focus on a text to be submitted to ministers in Hong Kong.
No such text has been drafted thus far, and any eventual report
is not expected to contain substantive issues. A compilation of
Members' proposals has been put together, but it is only meant for
use in discussions in the DSB-SS and is not likely to be submitted
to the Ministerial Conference. In the end, the report from the Chair
that is eventually presented in Hong Kong may simply be a description
of discussions that have taken place in the group.
The next meeting
of the DSB-SS has been scheduled for 14 November. Delegates do not
anticipate that it will prove to be very substantial. However, they
are not ruling out the possibility that acceleration in the other
negotiating areas might lead to an increased focus on the DSU review.
Nevertheless, expectations for progress on the matter at Hong Kong
remain very low.
ICTSD reporting.
SPS
COMMITTEE LOOKS AT WAYS FORWARD ON S&D
The WTO Committee
on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) held a short session on 24 October
that looked at special and differential treatment (S&D), EU
standards for cinnamon imports, and China's compliance with SPS
commitments.
Chair Gregg
Young of the US attempted to re-start work on Paragraph 43 of the
committee's June report on S&D to the General Council (G/SPS/35),
which identified specific ways for Members to address developing
country concerns related to SPS measures (see BRIDGES
Weekly, 6 July 2005). India and the African Group, sponsors
of the five S&D proposals that have been referred to the SPS
Committee, said the revised versions of their texts should serve
as the basis for the next round of talks on the matter. However,
the US and Young suggested that the course of action outlined in
Paragraph 43 should form the basis of talks at the next meeting,
since the SPS Committee had agreed upon the paragraph in June.
Sri Lanka, the
world's biggest exporter of cinnamon, argued that the EU's ban on
traces of sulphur dioxide in cinnamon was restricting imports and
hurting over 200,000 producers. It requested the EU to suspend the
ban, at least until a new international standard could be agreed
upon. The EU responded that it was consulting with experts on the
matter.
As part of the
'transitional review' of China's implementation of WTO rules, a
process mandated by China's terms of accession, the EU and the US
highlighted their concerns regarding the China's compliance with
the SPS Agreement's demands on transparency, risk assessment and
management (G/SPS/W/178). In response, China pointed out that it
was working hard, had improved notification practices, and was in
compliance with the commitments made under its accession protocol.
The SPS committee
is scheduled to meet at the end of January 2006.
ICTSD reporting.
|