|
CTD-SS: MEMBERS
ASK "HAS PROGRESS BEEN MADE?"
At a 21 November
informal meeting of the WTO Committee on Trade and Development Special
Session (CTD-SS), Members agreed on draft Hong Kong Ministerial
Declaration text concerning special and differential treatment (S&D)
to send to the General Council. However, Members did differ in their
opinions on how to reflect the progress, or lack thereof, on five
proposed amendments to specific WTO agreements.
During recent
meetings of the CTD-SS, developing countries argued that since Members
had not reached complete agreement on the wording of the proposed
amendments, the draft text should not say that there had been "progress"
on the 'agreement-specific S&D proposals.' However, developed
countries were wary of deleting any reference to "progress"
from the text, contending that positions on the proposals are significantly
closer now than they once were. To resolve the matter, Members agreed
that the four paragraph-long text would say that "some progress"
had been made and that Chair Faizel Ismail of South Africa would
make verbal reference to the disagreement on "progress"
while presenting the text to the General Council.
No convergence
on agreement-specific proposals
The divergence
on the reference to "progress" reflects disagreement on
many sections of the agreement-specific proposals, which the CTD-SS
has focused on since May in the hope of reaching agreement on them
before Hong Kong (see BRIDGES
Weekly, 16 November 2005). Most of the disagreements centre
upon how obligatory the language in the new texts should be.
Members were
unable to make any breakthroughs on the proposals during intensive
negotiations in an informal session on 17 November and a formal
meeting on 18 November, and instead decided to include different
versions of each of the proposed texts in an annex to the draft
ministerial text on S&D. This text is expected to contain two
versions of each of the five proposals -- one drafted by the LDCs
based upon discussions and the other by, say, the US or the Latin
American countries. The draft text allows for ministers in Hong
Kong to make a political decision to approve the five proposals.
Swiss call
for "reinvigorating" outstanding issues
Drawing on the
perceived lack of progress on agreement-specific proposals, Switzerland
and a number of developed countries asked for a reference to the
"reinvigoration of all outstanding issues" to be inserted
into the draft ministerial text. This refers to the cross-cutting
or systemic concerns that were placed on the sidelines of the negotiations
in May 2005 when Members decided to focus on the agreement-specific
proposals.
Developed countries
have generally expressed the view that addressing these issues at
the same time or even before agreement-specific proposals is an
integral part of the mandate given to the CTD-SS. Indeed, one delegate
implied that progress on agreement-specific proposals was contingent
on movement on cross-cutting issues.
African Group
countries, on the other hand, feel that the sequencing set out by
the July Package (WT/L/579) calls for agreement-specific issues
to be dealt with before cross-cutting issues. Several developing
countries are concerned that a reference of the sort that Switzerland
is seeking could lead to agreement-specific proposals being put
on the back-burner in favour of cross-cutting issues in the post-Hong
Kong period.
Nonetheless,
the reference to reinvigorating "outstanding issues" was
included at the end of the text forwarded to the General Council,
but the sequencing of the two types of concerns was not explicitly
mentioned.
Call to bring
S&D proposals back rejected
The African
Group on 16 November called for WTO negotiating groups to send the
so-called "category 2" agreement-specific S&D proposals
that had been referred to them in 2002 back to the CTD-SS. The proposals
had originally been sent to the relevant negotiating groups so that
experts in the issue-areas, such as sanitary and phytosanitary measures
(SPS), would be able to examine and improve them.
Arguing that
there had been little movement on these proposals in the various
negotiating groups, the African Group suggested that it was time
to bring them back to the CTD-SS. Other Members disagreed, suggesting
that the experts on each issue area would be the best ones to examine
the S&D proposals and that the CTD-SS already had a heavy work-load.
The draft text sent to the General Council does not support the
African Group idea, and instead urges the negotiating groups to
"expeditiously complete" their work on the S&D proposals.
CTD considers
paragraph on commodities
Cote d'Ivoire,
Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Tanzania and Zimbabwe made a proposal at
an informal 22 November meeting of the regular session of the Committee
on Trade and Development for a paragraph on commodities to be included
in the draft Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration text. The proposed
paragraph refers to the impact of commodity price decline and volatility
on the livelihoods of farmers in countries dependent on primary
commodities. It calls on Members to launch negotiations on commodities
that would aim to eliminating non-tariff barriers and tariff escalation
(higher tariffs on processed goods than on raw commodities). The
six countries also want negotiations to review and improve WTO rules
that relate to the stabilisation of prices through supply management
systems as well as the use of export taxes and restrictions.
Although most
Members at the meeting agreed that the Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration
text should include a reference to commodities, they could not resolve
differences on whether it should mention negotiations, stabilisation
measures or export taxes and restrictions. CTD regular session Chair
Ambassador Gomi Theraka Senadhira said that discussions on commodities
would continue at informal meetings next week.
Aid for trade
paragraph in the works?
A group of Members
that have been meeting informally outside any particular negotiating
body are investigating the possibility of submitting a paragraph
on aid for trade to the General Council for inclusion in the draft
Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration. They met on 22 and 23 November,
and are currently in the process of identifying elements for a draft
text.
ICTSD reporting.
|