|
AGREEMENT
REACHED ON NEW TROPICAL TIMBER TRADE PACT
Representatives
from over 180 governments and international organisations reached
consensus on a successor pact to the 1994 International Tropical
Timber Agreement (ITTA) on 27 January, following two weeks of intensive
negotiations in Geneva. The new commodities agreement aims to promote
the expansion and diversification of international trade in legally
harvested tropical timber from sustainably managed forests, as well
as to encourage the sustainable management of such forests. Like
its predecessor, the new treaty was negotiated under the auspices
of the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Once ratified,
it will replace the 1994 pact, which will expire at the end of 2006.
Delegates expressed
relief that both consuming and producing members of the 1994 pact
were able to reach agreement based upon the four rounds of talks
that have been held since 2003. They said that both sides were able
to overcome their differences thanks to a spirit of good faith as
well as concessions made in the last days of the talks on the scope
of and funding for the new agreement.
Commodities
agreement and/or MEA?
On the question
of the scope of the new pact, references to ecological services,
non-timber forest products (NTFPs), and certification and voluntary
market-based mechanisms proved particularly contentious.
The preamble
of the final agreement recognises "the importance of the multiple
economic, environmental and social benefits provided by forests,
including timber and non-timber forest products and environmental
services." References to certification and market-based mechanisms
were removed due to concerns largely from timber-producing countries
that this could infringe on national sovereignty and also possibly
affect their obligations under other trade agreements such as the
WTO. However, the agreement does encourage information sharing for
voluntary mechanisms such as certification, despite comments from
India, Malaysia and Brazil that this assistance must not prejudice
ITTA members' rights under trade agreements.
The new agreement
also aims to contribute to sustainable development and poverty alleviation;
improve information sharing on timber trade; promote increased processing
of sustainably-harvested tropical timber in the countries where
it is grown; improve the marketing and distribution of tropical
timber; encourage members to develop national policies aimed at
the sustainable use and conservation of forests and their genetic
resources; strengthen capacity for forest law enforcement and governance
and to address illegal logging and related trade; promote understanding
of NTFPs; and recognise the role of forest-dependent indigenous
and local communities.
Financing
as the key question
Some of the
most controversial issues in the talks centred upon financing for
the new accord and what proportions of the necessary funding should
come from producers -- primarily developing countries -- and consumers.
A significant
proportion of the impact of the ITTA is felt through project funding.
Such grants -- authorised by the International Tropical Timber Council,
the treaty's governing body, and administered by its secretariat,
the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) -- have been
falling steadily since the early 1990s. During the negotiations,
demands from developing-country timber producers for increased funding
clashed with a range of different offers from developed countries.
In the last hours of 27 January, however, the EU and producer countries
were able to resolve their differences over the proposed funding
structure.
IGOs applaud
the deal, NGOs noticeably absent
"The agreement
establishes a framework for cooperation between exporters and importers,"
said Manuel Sobral, executive director of the International Tropical
Timber Organisation. Lakshmi Puri, the head of UNCTAD's Division
on Trade in Goods, Services, and Commodities, reaffirmed the importance
of the pact as the only internationally-negotiated agreement on
forests. However, environmental groups have been noticeably absent
from talks, with many of them choosing to turn their backs on the
ITTA and the UN Forum on Forests in favour of the Convention on
Biological Diversity and the EU-sponsored Forest Law Enforcement,
Governance and Trade processes, which also seek to combat illegal
trade in timber.
The treaty provides
for a complex division of voting power among the 33 producing and
26 consuming countries that are members of ITTA-1994. Each of the
two blocs is assigned 1000 votes. These are divided among producer
countries on the basis of regional distribution, each country's
relative share of tropical forest resources, and timber export volumes.
Consumer countries' voting power is linked to their imports of tropical
timber. Governments will be able to sign onto the new pact as of
3 April. It will enter into force once it is signed or ratified
by 12 producer governments accounting for 60 percent of their votes,
and 10 consumer governments accounting for 60 percent of tropical
timber imports in 2005.
For daily reporting,
see IISD linkages http://www.iisd.ca/forestry/itto/itta4/
For previous
news coverage of ITTA and other forestry developments, visit http://www.trade-environment.org/page/ictsd/news/forestswater.htm
For relevant
resources, visit http://www.trade-environment.org/page/theme/nat_res/forest.htm
For relevant
links, visit http://www.trade-environment.org/page/links/forests.htm
ICTSD reporting;
EARTH NEGOTIATIONS BULLETIN Vol. 24 No. 65-75, 16-27 January.
|