| AG
CHAIR CIRCULATES REFERENCE PAPER ON SVEs
WTO agriculture
negotiators from some 20-odd countries expressed broad sympathy
for the concerns of small and vulnerable economies (SVEs) during
a so-called 'Room F' small-group consultation on 4 May. However,
final arrangements for SVEs are likely to depend on the kinds of
special and differential treatment ultimately agreed to for all
developing countries. Agriculture Chair Ambassador Crawford Falconer
convened the meeting after circulating a 'reference paper' on the
subject earlier that day.
The Doha Declaration
reaffirms Members' commitment to adopt specific measures to facilitate
SVEs' fuller integration into the multilateral trading system "without
creating a sub-category of WTO Members."
Unlike standard
Room F consultations, many of the negotiators present were from
SVEs that normally tend not to be included in such gatherings, although
major traders were also present. According to sources, the meeting
was primarily an opportunity for the demandeurs to set out their
positions and hear initial responses. The chair indicated that future
Room F consultations would have more of the main Member groupings
represented and perhaps fewer SVEs present.
The reference
paper drew on a November 2005 submission from 14 SVEs (TN/AG/GEN/11)
calling for SVEs to be exempted from the standard tiered tariff
reduction formula, and instead to cut all tariffs by no more than
15 percent, with a minimum of 10 percent per tariff line, and no
tariff cap. They also wanted all of their agricultural tariff lines
to receive automatic access to the Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM)
for developing countries, and the ability to self-designate 'Special
Products' (SPs) for complete exemption from tariff reduction and
tariff rate quota commitments. Finally, the SVEs requested other
countries to cut tariffs substantially on the few products of export
interest to them.
The Chair concluded
that any SVE-specific arrangements would depend on the overall tariff
reduction formula for developing countries, as well as the outcome
of discussions on SPs and the SSM.
ICTSD reporting.
|