| APEC,
OTHERS WANT DOHA TALKS TO RESTART, BUT MAKE NO NEW OFFERS
Heads of state
from 21 Pacific Rim countries region have said they are willing
to offer fresh concessions to break the deadlock in the Doha Round
trade talks -- so long as governments "in other regions"
do the same. At the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum
in Hanoi from 18-19 November, the leaders called for the troubled
negotiations to "resume without further delay."
"Each of
us is committed to moving beyond our current positions in key areas
of the round," they declared in an 18 November statement on
the WTO negotiations. "That means making deeper reductions
in trade-distorting farm support by major players, creating new
market access in agriculture, making real cuts in industrial tariffs,
and establishing new openings in services trade, while dealing seriously
with Members' concerns and sensitivities." The leaders called
upon their "partners in other regions to be similarly bold
and engaged."
The statement
was framed in somewhat stronger language than the dozens of similar
declarations of support issued by international gatherings in recent
years. However, the APEC leaders did not announce any specific new
figures for tariff and subsidy reduction.
Suspended since
late July over differences on farm subsidy and tariff cuts, the
WTO negotiations have been showing signs of stirring. WTO Director-General
Pascal Lamy on 16 November gave Geneva-based trade diplomats the
green light to start informal discussions on all issues in the Doha
Round talks. However, he said that "fully-fledged negotiations"
would only begin "when Members are ready to put numbers to
the flexibilities they have already expressed in general terms on
key issues, in particular on agriculture and domestic support."
While the APEC
summit was underway in Hanoi, EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson
made a speech in New Delhi in which he also called on WTO Members,
especially the US, to take the steps necessary to bring the round
to conclusion. Although he mentioned the additional farm tariff
cuts that Brussels had hinted at before the talks were suspended,
he too refrained from putting forward any specific numbers that
would spell out precisely what was now on offer.
The EU and India,
along with Brazil, are among the world's few major economies that
do not belong to APEC, whose members for close to 60 percent of
the world's economy and 50 percent of its trade.
APEC puts
Pacific Rim FTA on backburner
In Hanoi, APEC
heads of state said that the Doha Round remained "a top priority."
They effectively put a proposal to turn APEC into a mammoth free
trade area on the backburner, acknowledging an assessment by a group
of regional business leaders that there would be "practical
difficulties in negotiating a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific
(FTAAP) at this time." Instead, they instructed officials to
examine potential for regional economic integration, including an
FTAAP "as a long-term prospect," and report to next year's
summit in Australia.
The APEC Business
Advisory Council's report to the summit, which mirrored much of
the leaders' eventual declaration, also said the "plethora"
of bilateral and regional trade agreements in the region "presents
businesses with additional costs and administrative burdens."
It urged a primary focus on the Doha Round, arguing that "multilateral
trade negotiations have historically proved to be the most effective
way to stimulate trade and thus world economic growth." However,
the group did recommend that APEC should continue work on developing
a template for WTO-plus FTAs. It suggested that similar accords
would be easier to consolidate -- potentially into an FTAAP -- in
the event that the multilateral talks ultimately fail.
APEC also announced
a series of measures to promote trade facilitation, investment liberalisation,
and intellectual property rights protection in the region.
Another call
for the resumption and successful conclusion of the Doha Round talks
came from the 'other' G-20. This group of finance ministers and
central bank governors from leading industrialised and developing
countries -- not to be confused with the developing country alliance
in the WTO agriculture negotiations -- met in Melbourne on 18-19
November.
Trade officials
talking, but little new to discuss
US Agriculture
Secretary Mike Johanns went to India from 18-22 November to meet
with his counterparts there. In a speech to a business audience
in New Delhi on 21 November, he urged India to offer greater access
to its agricultural markets. In particular, he said that 'the three
S's' -- special products, sensitive products, and the special safeguard
mechanism -- should not be used to shield many tariff lines from
liberalisation.
Johanns said
it was excessive to seek to shield 20 percent of tariff lines from
the full force of the reduction formula, as India and other members
of the G-33 bloc of countries have been. He said that India's own
proposed cuts would force the duties levied on only 14 percent of
tariff lines to below their currently applied level. However, Washington
has thus far sought overall tariff cuts deeper than those proposed
by India's G-20 group.
Indian officials
maintained that they would reject any deal that threatened to compromise
the livelihoods of the country's hundreds of millions of subsistence
farmers. Johanns told Reuters after his visit that he gained had
a better understanding of the Indian government's position, but
that the market access flexibilities remained Washington's "big
hang up."
Notably, Johanns
did not mention the possibility of further farm subsidy cuts by
the US in his New Delhi speech, simply expressing "sincere
hope that [Washington's] ambitious offer tabled about a year ago
will be matched."
Several WTO
Members believe that the US needs to accept deeper cuts to its agricultural
subsidies as part of a Doha Round deal. In his own speech in New
Delhi three days earlier, Mandelson said that the "rest of
the world" was asking the US to make "a real terms cut
of a few billion dollars in trade-distorting farm subsidy payments
to farmers who are not near the breadline." He argued that
in light of US farm spending and the potential gains from the round,
"the reduction being sought is bearable."
In Montevideo
to commemorate the twentieth anniversary of the launch of the Uruguay
Round negotiations that gave rise to the WTO, Lamy on 22 November
reiterated his view that the subsidy and tariff cuts already on
offer in the Doha talks far exceed the value of those obtained in
the earlier round. He called on governments to show the "political
leadership, commitment and goodwill" necessary to bring the
negotiations to a successful conclusion.
ICTSD reporting;
"U.S. pushes India on farm trade, no Doha breakthrough,"
REUTERS, 22 February 2006; "APEC leaders say 'urgent need'
to break trade deadlock," AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE, 18 November
2006.
|