ENVIRONMENT:
WTO MEMBERS DISCUSS INFORMATION EXCHANGE WITH MEAS
A recent meeting
of the special (negotiating) session of the WTO Committee on Trade
and Environment (CTE) focused on the relatively less contentious
agenda item of procedures for information exchange between multilateral
environmental agreement (MEA) secretariats and relevant WTO committees.
Informal talks continued on liberalisation of environmental goods
and services.
The meeting
of CTE special session, which took place from 1-2 March, was the
first following the resumption of full Doha round talks a month
ago. Discussions revolved around a new US submission (TN/TE/W/70,
available at http://docsonline.wto.org)
on Para 31 (ii) of the Doha Declaration (information exchange).
The submission proposed that MEA information sessions within the
CTE take place on a regular basis, initially once per year. Regarding
MEA observer status in other WTO bodies, the US proposed that
the CTE special session develop a non-exhaustive list of "indicative
questions" to aid these WTO bodies in making decisions on
a case-by-case basis. Possible questions included whether an MEA
contained specific trade obligations or other trade-related obligations,
and if so, whether these were relevant to the particular WTO body's
scope of work. The US also proposed that the CTE special session
grant seven MEA secretariats (which now have ad hoc observership)
permanent observer status for the remainder of the Doha.
The US stressed
that communication between all interested ministries (i.e. transport,
agriculture, customs) should be improved at the domestic level.
It emphasised that enhanced international coordination, while
useful and important, could not replace the much more direct and
efficient means of ongoing national-level coordination between
trade and environment officials. The submission proposed that
the WTO secretariat, with the aid of relevant MEA secretariats,
focus more assistance on building the capacity of developing country
Members to foster their own internal trade and environment coordination
processes.
Commenting
on the submission, Switzerland wanted specific reference to the
UN Environment Programme (UNEP) included in any decision on information
exchange. The EU called for permanent observership for all MEA
secretariats. 'On the whole,' however, one developing country
delegate said, 'the US submission seemed acceptable to most if
not all Members.'
Informal discussion
also took place on the liberalisation of environmental goods and
services (EGS). Generally, developed countries have proposed that
Members should agree to a 'list' of specific environmental goods
slated for liberalisation. Many developing countries fear that
such a list would mainly feature goods of export interest to developed
countries, and have come up with alternative approaches. A developing
country trade delegate said the recent informal talks had been
'constructive,' noting that he sensed a certain 'softening' of
attitudes among delegations.
The next CTE
special session is scheduled for 2-3 May. According to trade sources,
India is planning to submit a revised proposal on its 'project'
approach to EGS before this meeting. The chair of the negotiations,
Ambassador Toufiq Ali (Bangladesh), will likely convene an informal
meeting on 30 March.
ICTSD reporting.
NAMA
TALKS MAKE PROGRESS ON NON-TARIFF BARRIERS
While core
issues related to reducing industrial tariffs remain blocked pending
movement on farm trade in the Doha round negotiations, Members
made progress on non-tariff barriers (NTBs) during a week of discussions
on non-agricultural market access (NAMA) that wrapped up in Geneva
on 2 March.
The chair,
Ambassador Don Stephenson (Canada), called the developments encouraging.
Specifically, he said Members had agreed to submit textual proposals
on vertical (sectoral) and horizontal (general) NTBs by 23 March.
He would then compile the proposals into a rudimentary negotiating
text.
Members also
met informally to discuss sectoral liberalisation initiatives,
set to bring down tariffs in a particular sector once enough countries
sign onto them. The US reported on the discussions on chemicals,
Japan on the electronic and electrical sector as well as the autos
and auto parts sector, Switzerland on enhanced health care and
pharmaceutical products, Thailand on gems and jewellery, and Canada
on fish and forestry products.
Members did
not spend time discussing the main divisive NAMA issues: the tariff
reduction formula numbers that will determine the depth of cuts;
flexibilities for developing countries to shield some products
from tariff reduction; and the treatment of unbound tariffs (see
BRIDGES Weekly, 28 February
2007).
Discussions
seeking to generate an overall political deal covering key areas
of the Doha round -- especially agriculture, but also NAMA --
are ongoing (see related story, this issue).
Chair Stephenson
will continue to hold informal talks on NAMA; the next week of
official negotiations is scheduled to begin on 26 March.
ICTSD reporting.
INDIA
UNDER PRESSURE IN WINE AND SPIRITS SPAT
Due to growing
threats of WTO dispute settlement procedures, India has indicated
that it is considering lowering its import duties on wine and
spirits.
Brussels formally
challenged the tariffs in November 2006 by requesting consultations
at the WTO, with Washington following suit on 6 March. For years,
Brussels and Washington have raised concerns over India's strong-beverage
duties, which allegedly run as high as 550 percent in certain
cases. Until now, India has refused to modify its system. Under
its WTO commitments, the implicated tariffs are to be held within
150 percent. However, on top of this base duty, India purportedly
imposes an 'additional duty' and an 'extra additional duty' on
imports of wine and distilled spirits.
India's budget
for 2007-2008, which was unveiled last week, did not reflect any
reductions in tariffs on wines and spirits, prompting EU Agricultural
Commissioner Mariann Fischer Boel to state that she was 'disappointed'.
Kamal Nath,
Indian Minister of Commerce, noted that a cut in the tariffs could
be made outside the budget. "This is being discussed at the
highest level in the government" Nath said after a meeting
with Boel on 7 March. He further stated that he did not believe
that "it will come to a stage where the WTO will have to
settle the dispute." In addition, India's Secretary of Commerce
Gopal Pillai's stated that India is planning to scrap the duties
and introduce legislation that would level imported liquors with
domestic ones. He said he believed a resolution could be reached
in two months.
Exports of
wines and spirits to India have grown continuously over the past
years, but allegedly no where near its full potential. In 2005,
EU spirit exports amounted to EUR43 million and wine exports to
EUR7 million. US exports of wine and spirits to India have grown
by 200 percent in 2000-2005.
ICTSD reporting; "Kamal Nath hints at cutting import duties
on wines, spirits," ZEENEWS, 7 March 2007; "India sees
end to wine, spirits duty dispute", REUTERS, 7 March 2007;
"U.S. files WTO case against India over wine and spirits
duties" PEOPLE'S DAILY, 7 March 2007; "US cites India
for duties on wines, spirits" MALAISYA SUN, 7 March 2007.
.