|
LINKS BETWEEN
PATENT RULES AND ACCESS TO GREEN TECHNOLOGY COME UNDER SCRUTINY
On the eve of
an international conference on climate change in Bali, the European
Parliament has called for examining the impact of intellectual property
protections on the spread of environmentally sound technologies,
suggesting that WTO rules might be impeding their diffusion.
Wider use of
energy-saving technology would help curb greenhouse gas emissions.
However, the extent to which patent protections play a major role
in raising the cost of using such technology remains uncertain.
In a resolution
adopted on 29 November, the European Parliament pointed to the "urgent
need to develop production, consumption and trade patterns that
mitigate climate change and its economic impact." It said that
the Clean Development Mechanism, the Kyoto Protocol's principal
system for technology transfer, "is not yet sufficient to significantly
shift investment patterns in those sectors that have the greatest
impact on climate change, such as power generation, transport and
industrial energy use."
Given this insufficiency,
the parliament urged the European Commission, which negotiates trade
agreements on behalf of EU members, to push for removing tariff
and non-tariff barriers that "prevent or slow the dissemination
of low carbon technologies." To this end, it also recommended
"launching a study on possible amendments to the WTO Agreement
on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights in order
to allow for the compulsory licensing of environmentally necessary
technologies, within the framework of clear and stringent rules
for the protection of intellectual property." Compulsory licensing
effectively suspends patents on a technology, allowing for the production
of generic copies against the payment of a royalty to the patent-holder.
The EU could
help promote the development of global-scale 'climate-friendly'
industries by working to lower barriers to 'green' trade through
measures such as "removing tariffs on 'green' goods at the
WTO level" and "reshaping the rules on intellectual property
rights," the parliament noted.
The resolution
pointed to the EU's status as a key player in alternative energy
technologies, particularly in the wind and solar sector. "The
EU should become a market leader in the worldwide export of environmental
goods and services," it said.
Chinese officials,
currently resisting heavy pressure from some industrialised nations
to accept binding caps on greenhouse gas emissions, have increasingly
been arguing that intellectual property protections are putting
energy-saving technologies out of the reach of developing countries.
"I think we have to resolve a lot of barriers on the so-called
intellectual property rights issues," Zhou Dadi of China's
Energy Research Institute said last week, reports Reuters. "That
means if you really want to help China to speed up the technology
transfer process, we have to really think about how to help China
cover the high costs. Most of them are not based on material, they're
based on intellectual property rights." Zhou expressed hope
that China would raise the issue in Bali.
However, some
studies reveal that the key barriers encountered by developing countries
may not be related to intellectual property protection, but to trade
barriers and other issues related to market structures.
John Barton,
an emeritus professor of law at Stanford University and a leading
authority on technology transfer, has demonstrated that there is
a difference between the renewable energy sector (solar, photo-voltaic,
biofuels, and wind) and the pharmaceutical sector, the classic example
of how compulsory licences have been used to create dramatically
cheaper drugs and expand access to medicine. In the pharmaceutical
sector, patents and the associated monopoly rights often have a
substantial upward impact on price, as there may be no substitutes
for a new medicine, he wrote this month in Bridges Trade BioRes
Review. In contrast, in the renewable energy sector, patent protections
have long expired on the basic technologies used. Thus, only specific
improvements or features tend to be patented. As a result, several
competing patented products exist - and the competition usually
brings prices down compared what might be charged under a monopoly.
"Any judgment
about the [European] Parliament's proposal about compulsory licensing
needs to be made only after we know better whether there is a problem,"
Barton told Bridges. He succinctly summarised the dilemma of a compulsory
licensing policy for green technologies: "the risks of not
granting a compulsory license readily enough are that technology
will be monopolized and priced too high; the risks of granting such
a license too readily are that incentives for private research will
be decreased."
Barton said
that in the cases he had studied, intellectual property-related
obstacles to technology transfer were relatively smaller. In these
sectors, intellectual property was generally accessible either through
competitively priced products, or through modest royalty fees. However,
he said that other sectors, notably the automobile industry, merited
further study. He suspected that the real problem in some instances
might lie more in the realm of anti-competitive practices than that
of intellectual property.
That said, Barton
noted that the development and transfer of green technologies transfer
"is absolutely crucial to the world's future." He suggested
that developed countries could try to promote innovation through
means other than patent protection, for instance by committing a
portion of technology development funding to the needs of developing
countries, and working with developing country firms on such research.
The European
Parliament's resolution on trade and climate change is available
online at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?Type=TA&Reference=P6-TA-2007-0576&language=EN.
ICTSD reporting;
"Patenting and access to clean energy technologies in developing
countries," BRIDGES TRADE BIORES REVIEW, 3 December 2007; "China
says rethink of IPR needed for energy saving," REUTERS, 28
November 2007.
|