EU leaders reach agreement on proposed 2030 climate, energy goals

3 November 2014

In a much-anticipated move, the 28 nation bloc has set climate and energy targets out to the end of next decade. 

EU heads of state and government reached a political agreement at the end of October on a new climate and energy policy framework for 2030. After some reportedly late night haggling, the 28 political leaders endorsed a binding 40 percent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target by 2030 from 1990 levels, an EU-wide binding renewable energy target of at least 27 percent, and an EU-wide indicative energy efficiency target of at least 27 percent. The new package will take over from the bloc’s current “20-20-20” goals – which set emissions reduction, renewables usage, and energy efficiency targets for the end of this decade.

“It was not easy, not at all, but we managed to reach a fair decision. It sets Europe on an ambitious yet cost-effective climate and energy path,” said Herman van Rompuy, President of the EU Council, the bloc’s highest decision-making body. Rompuy’s remarks point towards deep divisions that emerged between member states in the past months over the shape of the framework. Poland, whose economy relies on emissions-intensive coal for much of its electricity, was said to have galvanised a group of eastern European states to protest against the level of ambition. Meanwhile, Portugal and Spain also allegedly threw up red flags, calling for the strong language on building an interconnected EU energy market.

Road to Paris

The move has been closely watched by the international community due to its potential significance for the ongoing multilateral climate talks. Conducted under the umbrella of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), nearly 200 nations are working to seal a universal, binding emissions-cutting deal, in time for a meeting in Paris, France next year. The EU has traditionally been characterised as a leader in this area following comparatively strong efforts to tackle climate change and engagement in past UN climate talks. Furthermore, any mitigation action by the group is considered significant in economic terms, given that it accounts for 24 percent of global GDP and represents the world’s largest single market. One objection voiced by various participants in the UN climate process over the years is the fear that unilateral climate action could hamper growth and the competitiveness of exports on world markets.

The October summit conclusions on the 2030 framework open with a reference to the UNFCCC process, underlining that the EU will revisit its new targets after the Paris conference.

Cutting emissions

According to the Council conclusions, all EU member states will participate in the target, balanced by calls for solidarity and equity. The emissions-cutting target agreed in October follows a proposal put forward by the EU’s executive branch in January. (See BioRes, 23 January 2014)

Jose Manuel Durao Barroso, President of the out-going European Commission, welcomed the development. “When we tabled our strategy back in January, many said it was the wrong thing to do at the wrong moment. Tonight we proved those doubters wrong,” Barroso said in a press conference, referring to some critics’ suggestion that the EU’s sluggish economy would not be able to cope with the proposed 40 percent reduction.

Carbon market

Leaders agreed at the October summit that 43 percent of the emissions reduction target would be met using the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS). According to media reports, free carbon allowances were offered to countries such as Poland in order to sweeten the overall deal. The Council conclusions on the proposed framework grant member states with a GDP per capita below 60 percent of the EU average the flexibility to hand out free ETS allowances to the energy sector. However, the document notes that the maximum free hand out should be no more than 40 percent of a member state’s auctionable allowances. A call is made for an improvement on transparency from the current modalities of free allocation.

The conclusions also endorse the channelling of funds from two percent of the total EU ETS allowances for the period to address some of the structural energy transition challenges facing poorer EU nations. Proceeds from the new reserve will be used to improve energy efficiency and modernise energy systems in member states with a GDP per capita below 60 percent of the EU average. The document calls for an eventual fund set up by the reserve to be managed by beneficiary member states with input from the European Investment Bank (EIB). This allegedly follows concerns by some member states that structural funds in the current climate and energy legislation are being misappropriated to prop up the fossil fuel industry.

Energy connectivity, security

In a win for countries such as Spain and Portugal, the conclusions make a bid to bolster energy connectivity between member states. The conclusions renew commitments to take urgent measures to achieve a minimum target of ten percent of existing electricity interconnections. The Commission is also mandated to report regularly on the process and technical needs of this planned integration in order to arrive at a target of 15 percent intra-EU export of generation capacity by 2030.

This ambition would see the bloc invest in new pipeline and grid infrastructure across EU borders. Lisbon and Madrid reportedly pushed hard in the final stages to ensure the inclusion of such language in order to export the region’s excess wind and solar power across the Pyrenees. A specific mention of both countries is made in the document alongside the Baltic States.

Over the past ten months, the situation in Ukraine has also put considerable pressure on the shape of the new framework, with the EU’s eastern European members raising specific concerns around energy security. A third of the region’s gas is imported from Russia, with almost half passing through Ukraine.

The conclusions reaffirm statements made by the European Council in June around the Commission’s proposed European Energy Security Strategy (EESS). The two targets on energy efficiency and renewable energy are also pitted as key instruments in shoring up energy access.

Will it be enough?

Both of the renewables and energy efficiency targets will not be binding on individual member states and the energy efficiency target is voluntary as it is in the current regime, a decision that has been criticised by some environmental groups. The European Commission had initially proposed a 30 percent binding EU-wide energy savings target for 2030. (See BioRes, 4 August 2014)

Meanwhile consultancy Ecofys has cautioned that a 40 percent reduction would not be enough to keep the EU on track towards its stated ambition of reducing emissions by 80 to 95 percent by 2050.

Moving forward the European Council has invited the Commission to table a legislative proposal to translate the conclusions into formal legislation. This will be undertaken by the new EU executive body headed up by Jean-Claude Juncker and is expected to be unveiled in 2015.

ICTSD reporting. 

This article is published under
3 November 2014
EU Commission proposes new fish catch limits The EU’s executive arm has proposed new catch limits for several stocks located in the Atlantic and North Sea for the coming year. These quotas will be...
3 November 2014
Climate negotiators met in October for the final pit stop ahead of this year’s annual UN climate conference. While some progress was made, commentators say much remains to be addressed in December...