New Models for Increasing Producer Benefits Through Sustainability Standards and Trade in Africa

13 October 2017

The potential for sustainable trade to be a catalyst for socially and environmentally sound development on the African continent is enormous. How can new partnerships and approaches to developing and implementing sustainability standards in Africa drive more benefits to producers?
 

Despite its enormous size, the dynamism of its inhabitants, and the natural riches of its territory, the African continent accounts for less than two percent of international trade. Given the potential of sustainable trade flows to be a driving force for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the question of how African producers can benefit from sustainable global value chains (GVCs) is crucial to answer.

The reasons for Africa’s lack of connectivity to global trade are many and complex. The newly-ratified Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA), aid for trade programmes, and other approaches aim at addressing some of these structural issues. However, for GVCs to contribute effectively to sustainable development, their development has to go hand in hand with responsible business conduct and social and environmental safeguards.

Credible sustainability standards systems are tools for promoting sustainable trade flows. By defining sustainable or responsible performance for a certain production process, sector, or commodity (which can be adapted to local conditions depending on the system) in a transparent and inclusive manner and coupling this to impartial and independent certification or verification, sustainability standards systems are increasingly shaping global trade flows. This article reflects on how the use of sustainability standards in Africa can foster new value chains with the potential to accelerate the continent’s progress towards the SDGs.
 

Sustainability standards, sustainable value chains, and the SDGs

Complying with standards to gain access to international markets is nothing new for producers and exporters in Africa. In export-oriented industries such as mining or certain agricultural markets such as cocoa, vegetables, and fresh flowers, the use of quality and safety standards are common. Companies operating in African countries are well aware of the need for complying with technical, quality, safety, or management standards (for example HACCP, GlobalGAP, ISO 9000, or ISO14000, etc).

Apart from such standards, voluntary sustainability standards have a wholly different scope; they address a range of production factors ranging from working conditions and labour rights to soil and waste management or biodiversity protection. In doing so, they go beyond mere quality or safety issues. Developed for specific production processes or commodities through transparent standard-setting processes, they address sustainability challenges in a concrete manner. Their criteria and requirements are linked to one or more of the 17 SDGs and often connect to various other international sustainability agendas (such as the Convention on Biodiversity, the New York Declaration on Forests, the Paris Climate Agreement, etc.). This means that the implementation of a credible sustainability standard by a company or producer can contribute to achieving SDG progress within the broader sector or industry, in the country where it is applied, and at the global level.

In contrast to their increasing role in global trade, the uptake of credible sustainability standards in African countries is limited. Exceptions include the West-African cocoa producing countries, where standards systems such as UTZ, Fairtrade, organic, and Rainforest Alliance have a long track record in creating sector-wide changes by providing incentives to producers. Certain standards systems such Fairtrade also have a long-standing presence in various agricultural markets (coffee, tea, and other crops), with Fairtrade certification active in nine African countries. In forestry and timber production, the use of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) standard has been growing in Africa, with 7,708,888 hectares of forest area certified in 2017.
 

Challenges

Despite these inroads, sustainable production verified by independent standard systems is still rare and represents a fraction of Africa’s total production in any sector. Indeed, for a number of reasons, African producers have difficulties in using sustainability standards to their advantage and fully capitalising on the rising demand for sustainably-produced goods and products.

The adoption barriers that prevent the implementation of sustainability standards in Africa are not specific to the continent. They are prominent in many contexts characterised by poor regulatory and governance capacities. One specific challenge relates to the lack of clear property rights, especially land tenure and use. The informal and fragmented nature of smallholder production is another important factor, which in turn complicates access to credit and investment. In this context, the costs for producers to implement sustainable practices and undergo assessment to a standard is high and upfront finance difficult to obtain.

Many efforts, often supported by international cooperation and investment, have sought to overcome such barriers. However, a recurring problem is the lack of clarity on consistent, long-term demand for sustainable certified products, which prevents producers from assessing the potential returns on investment.

For each of these challenges, there are high expectations and limited abilities for sustainability standards to address all of the issues on their own. To be accessible, effective, and impactful, sustainability standards require coherent and concerted support efforts that bring together producers and their communities, policymakers at various levels, and coalitions of private actors (retailers, traders, investors, etc.) committed to achieving sustainability goals. The need for such partnerships is nowhere greater than in Africa.
 

Transforming African markets through new partnerships

New partnerships – especially partnerships with governments – offer new potential for producers to access international markets while making progress on sustainable development. These partnerships involve building local ownership and capacity to meet the standards, while also ensuring a connection to the demand side in consuming markets and reducing compliance costs through new models.

One ongoing effort is the creation of sustainable cotton value chains in Africa through the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) and its Better Cotton Standard System (BCSS). The African continent provides around 5 percent of global cotton production, and cotton production is the mainstay of the livelihood of more than 2.5 million Africans. The BCI was established to improve cotton production practices globally and has taken off in three major African cotton producers: Mali, Senegal, and Mozambique. Through strategic partnerships, BCI engages strategic stakeholders in these cotton-producing countries to implement the principles and practices set by its standard. Government extension services are strengthened by the BCI’s support, thus facilitating sustainability improvements and compliance with the BCI standard. Importantly, the BCI and its partners are supported by an increasing number of buyer commitments from large producers and retailers, which ensures export markets and reduces price volatility.

Another example is that of South Africa’s experience with the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification for its hake fishery. This certification played a significant role in allowing the South African hake sector to weather the 2008 financial crisis by ensuring strong value-added export markets for its sustainably-caught fish. The government of South Africa has been a strong partner for the implementation of MSC. Specifically, the government has developed the Government’s Offshore Resource Observer Programme, which contributes scientific data and enforcement capacity to ensure that fish trawling is sustainable, resulting in a “co-management” of the fishery that leverages the strengths and resources of each partner.

Oil palm cultivation in Africa provides another area of collaboration. The African Palm Oil Initiative (APOI), a pan-African multi-stakeholder initiative covering ten West and Central African countries, was established in 2011 through engagement with the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), the leading international palm oil sustainability standard. The programme works to establish principles of national action on sustainable palm oil and goals of implementation at the national level. By working toward local ownership of the sustainability agenda, this initiative works to help growers in Africa strengthen their ability to achieve sustainable palm oil production with support from government, industry, and civil society. While still in its early stages, the APOI is developing the potential to recognise the sustainable production of palm oil at a landscape level, an innovative approach that could make sustainable production more accessible for producers.
 

Standards and beyond: Can policymakers create positive incentives?

The use of sustainability standards as building blocks for sustainable supply chains is already opening up promising avenues. The above examples are not just good illustrations of how new partnerships are making sustainability standards more accessible to African producers; they also indicate a renewed interest of governments in producing countries to engage with standards systems constructively.

However, to create sustainable trade flows, governments in both import and export markets have a range of unused options at their disposal to provide strong incentives. Policymakers at national, sub-national, or international levels can explore various measures to ensure adopting credible sustainability standards makes economic sense for producers.

Various trade-related instruments already integrate commitments or provide trade benefits linked to sustainability or other international norms. These include the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) and free trade agreements (FTAs) – which often integrate sustainability aspects, but without effective enforcement. Other instruments, such as EU regulations and directives, have been developed to focus on specific issues such as illegal logging, conflict minerals, and sustainability criteria for biofuels. These targeted instruments have already introduced strong incentives aimed at making supply chains leading into Europe more responsible and sustainable.

Governments could facilitate the trade of sustainable goods further by revising their GSP frameworks or other trade-related benefits (subsidies, development aid, etc.) to go beyond the country level and target the sector, cluster, or individual firm level – using credible standard systems as the basis for an effective co-regulatory approach to provide such incentives. Additionally, aid for trade and other development assistance aimed at helping producers reach credible sustainability standards can help ensure that investments achieve sustainability impacts.

Asides from trade-related measures, stronger demand can be mobilised at national or subnational levels. The implementation of sustainable public procurement has been an impactful way for policymakers to incentivise sustainable GVCs. A more recent development is the rise of multi-stakeholder sectoral “covenants” in countries such as Germany and the Netherlands, whereby governments aim to lock in whole industries towards greater sustainable sourcing. A promising measure, although untested so far, would be to reduce the value-added tax for sustainably-produced products, something which national governments could decide unilaterally to offset the additional costs of sustainable production.

In all of this, it is important to underline that credible sustainability standards provide the most accurate and transparent way to enable differentiation based on sustainable and responsible practices. Under the WTO’s Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, governments are asked to take “reasonable measures” to ensure that standards operating within their jurisdiction meet WTO principles and disciplines. Governments should take WTO norms into account when using private sustainability standards in public policy that affects trade and only work with standards that are accessible, transparent, and minimising overly burdensome requirements. To do this, a growing body of information is available to policymakers to understand the differences between different types of sustainability standard systems, including ISEAL’s Codes of Good Practice, the ISEAL Credibility Principles, and the Standards Map of the International Trade Centre.

Just like public regulation, even the most established private standards systems are not perfect. Nevertheless, the best systems are continuously improving. Crucially, they also provide much-needed clarity and consistency in terms of sustainability criteria, and link this to transparent and impartial enforcement through certification or other assurance mechanisms.

To unlock the potential of sustainable trade for African producers and markets, public and private actors will need to collaborate to provide enabling conditions, immediate investments, and long-term incentives. Credible multi-stakeholder sustainability standards offer themselves as points of convergence for such collective efforts.

Authors: Joshua Wickerham, Policy and Outreach Manager at the ISEAL Alliance. David D’Hollander, Policy and Outreach Coordination at the ISEAL Alliance.

This article is published under
13 October 2017
Compliance with product, service, and process requirements is a must to trade through global value chains. As some of these requirements are operated through private standard schemes, how can the...
Share: 
13 October 2017
Compliance with regulations and standards plays a central role in global trade competitiveness, in particular in the context of global value chains. What are the implications of these instruments for...
Share: